Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5797
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson
1.2 states risks need to be addressed before planning permission is granted. Permission has been but this is yet to complete. This is a procedural breach.
1.3 In the absence of certainty, the plan should not proceed. You are very far from "certainty". In 1.4 you are already fully looking at mitigation as if this consultation and document are irrelevant and can be ignored. This is a procedural breach.
Why is 1.5 only mentioning recreational pressure. What about the increase in traffic pollution, noise, the serious effects of pets on wildlife and domestically sourced pollution.
What is described in this chapter is NOT the purpose of the SPD.
1.2 states risks need to be addressed before planning permission is granted. Permission has been but this is yet to complete. This is a procedural breach.
1.3 In the absence of certainty, the plan should not proceed. You are very far from "certainty". In 1.4 you are already fully looking at mitigation as if this consultation and document are irrelevant and can be ignored. This is a procedural breach.
Why is 1.5 only mentioning recreational pressure. What about the increase in traffic pollution, noise, the serious effects of pets on wildlife and domestically sourced pollution.
What is described in this chapter is NOT the purpose of the SPD.