3. Enabling development: the strategy
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 3198
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boudary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road.where is the evidence to support this?Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C:Sheltered etc: Visitors?medical?Transport?Supplies?Cats?
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boudary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road.where is the evidence to support this?Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C:Sheltered etc: Visitors?medical?Transport?Supplies?Cats?
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5210
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell
Issues noted in paras 3.7, 3.8, 3.11 and 3.12, most notably about the grossly out of date citation re CURLEWS
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to say B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Section: 3. Enabling development: the strategy
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and does not take into account dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on RED list, subject to massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5303
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell
Data issues and specifically the very out of date citation re Curlews which are now on the RED endangered species list.
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ?medical ?Transport ?Supplies ?
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5748
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Nick Jones
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?