3. Enabling development: the strategy

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 3198

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter

Representation Summary:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boudary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road.where is the evidence to support this?Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C:Sheltered etc: Visitors?medical?Transport?Supplies?Cats?

Full text:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boudary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road.where is the evidence to support this?Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C:Sheltered etc: Visitors?medical?Transport?Supplies?Cats?

Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 5210

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell

Representation Summary:

Issues noted in paras 3.7, 3.8, 3.11 and 3.12, most notably about the grossly out of date citation re CURLEWS

Full text:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to say B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Section: 3. Enabling development: the strategy
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and does not take into account dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on RED list, subject to massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2

Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 5303

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell

Representation Summary:

Data issues and specifically the very out of date citation re Curlews which are now on the RED endangered species list.

Full text:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd,& 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary ( where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that B-i-W has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample metadata'd photographic evidence that this is very wrong.
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species stated. Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.
The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and not take account of the dramatic decline in species. Curlew now on the RED list, and subject to a massive national campaign to preserve them from extinction.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ?medical ?Transport ?Supplies ?

Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 5748

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Nick Jones

Representation Summary:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?

Full text:

3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?