Process for applications within different zones

Object

Representation ID: 3189

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter

In the flow chart: Define "Exceptional Circumstances (box 2)
2.5Km = YES, then crucial that Initial check of Habitat MUST be done by a truly independent specialist to evaluate "supporting Habitat"
AEOI ruled out alone or" in Combination" ...with what?
"LSE likely due to impacts from recreation: " What about ALL other LSE's from development. If its an elderly residential development, trampling is unlikely, but CAT predation is almost guarenteed.
"Developer devises suitable mitigation...." Why is this not a Duty of the Planning Officers? The developer has no interest in creating any scheme that may be costly and effective, but the BDMC officers can stipulate what must happen .
There is no overall firm policy that any development within 2.5km WILL provide substantial funding to your proposed mitigation startegy...and you even propose to allow them to

Object

Representation ID: 5197

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell

In the flow chart: Define "Exceptional Circumstances (box 2)
2.5Km = YES, then crucial that Initial check of Habitat MUST be done by a truly independent specialist to evaluate "supporting Habitat"
AEOI ruled out alone or" in Combination" ...with what?
"LSE likely due to impacts from recreation: " What about ALL other LSE's from development. If its an elderly residential development, trampling is unlikely, but CAT predation is almost guaranteed.
"Developer devises suitable mitigation...." Why is this not a Duty of the Planning Officers? The developer has no interest in creating any scheme that may be costly and effective, but the BDMC officers can stipulate what must happen .
There is no overall firm policy that any development within 2.5km WILL provide substantial funding to your proposed mitigation strategy...and you even propose to allow them to pay in instalments.

Object

Representation ID: 5301

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell

In the flow chart: Define "Exceptional Circumstances (box 2)
2.5Km = YES, then crucial that Initial check of Habitat MUST be done by a truly independent specialist to evaluate "supporting Habitat"
AEOI ruled out alone or" in Combination" ...with what?
"LSE likely due to impacts from recreation: " What about ALL other LSE's from development. If its an elderly residential development, trampling is unlikely, but CAT predation is almost guaranteed.
"Developer devises suitable mitigation...." Why is this not a Duty of the Planning Officers? The developer has no interest in creating any scheme that may be costly and effective, but the BDMC officers can stipulate what must happen .
There is no overall firm policy that any development within 2.5km WILL provide substantial funding to your proposed mitigation strategy...and you even propose to allow them to pay in instalments.

Object

Representation ID: 5538

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A & J Hardy

Agent: SSA Planning Limited

We consider that seeking contributions from tourist accommodation as well as dwellings is a form of double-counting, as each resident will likely also at some point be a tourist and vice versa. It will also impact the viability of new tourist accommodation, a key component of post-pandemic economic recovery locally and nationally. We do not consider the impact from each space or unit of self-catering, caravan and touring holiday accommodation to be the same as that from a dwelling and the supporting text and documents do not evidence this. Assessing impact in this way appears not to account for the greater seasonality and likelihood of voids in self-catering and particularly caravan and touring holiday accommodation compared to dwellings (or hotel and guest house accommodation). Indeed, as paragraph 5.16 indicates, holiday makers are outliers in survey results, yet would comprise all of the users of self-catering, caravan and touring holiday accommodation.

Object

Representation ID: 5760

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Nick Jones

In the flow chart: Define "Exceptional Circumstances (box 2), 2.5Km = YES, then it is crucial that Initial check of Habitat MUST be done by a truly independent specialist to evaluate "supporting Habitat"
AEOI ruled out alone or "in Combination" ...with what?
"LSE likely due to impacts from recreation: " What about ALL other LSE's from development. If its an elderly residential development, trampling is unlikely, but CAT predation is almost guaranteed.
"Developer devises suitable mitigation...." Why is this not a Duty of the Planning Officers? The developer has no interest in creating any scheme which may be costly and effective, but the BDMC officers can stipulate what must happen .
There is no overall firm policy that any development within 2.5km WILL provide substantial funding to your proposed mitigation strategy...and you even propose to allow them to pay in instalments.

Object

Representation ID: 5857

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson

What are the "exceptional circumstances" mentioned in the first red box?
Again only recreational impact is being considered. Why has the effects of traffic, pollution, noise, impact of pets on wildlife not been included? This is a procedural breach.
Why does the developer devise "suitable mitigation". That guarantees the cheapest possible, superficial cosmetic proposal. Why isn't it BDMC's planning department personnel who devise any mitigation? Are the developers in control of the council now?