What is the developer contribution used for?
Support
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 3204
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5213
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5305
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Whilst supporting the principle of developer contributions, there is no mention of use for minimising Fire Risks, and creating restricted access points/protected No-Go zones, banning of dogs off the lead, physical methods of disrupting and discouraging Cat Predation, and of creating new Bye-Laws to assist in the enforcement.
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, eiher to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies ( Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5666
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Nick Jones
I support developer contributions, but as experienced in the Sun Lane case, they are insufficient and most gets consumed by BMDC to use in their own way rather than benefitting the areas which have been adversely affected by the development. Funds are being used for political gain.
The mitigation strategy needs a governance structure with significant local input and in the case of Wharfe Valley, not dominated by those from over the moor!
I support developer contributions, but as experienced in the Sun Lane case, they are insufficient and most gets consumed by BMDC to use in their own way rather than benefitting the areas which have been adversely affected by the development. As a result, developments in the Wharfe valley are being used politically to fund Bradford City and its Labour constituents. Is it a coincidence that the town most impacted, Burley has an MP who is of a different party and defeated the current leader of the Council when she tried to become an MP?
Para 3.15; BDMC is shying away from insisting that all developers create SANG's, and also missing the opportunity to apply this retrospectively, either to those developments with current PP but not yet brought to market, or to existing homes developed over the past 20 years to be funded with a unique precept charge annually to assist in funding the strategy.
The mitigation strategy needs a Governance Structure that allows Parish Councils & authorised bodies (Emergency services, Natural England, RSPB, Curlew Recovery partnership etc)
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5869
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson
Why isn't BDMC insisting on a SANG being created? The Sun Lane development is enormous compared with the size of Burley-in-Wharfedale. It will destroy habitat of rare species such as Curlew and Lapwing birds. Surely the lack of a SANG is a glaring omission? Why doesn't the council stand up to the developer?
Why isn't BDMC insisting on a SANG being created? The Sun Lane development is enormous compared with the size of Burley-in-Wharfedale. It will destroy habitat of rare species such as Curlew and Lapwing birds. Surely the lack of a SANG is a glaring omission? Why doesn't the council stand up to the developer?