Level of growth to be mitigated

4.18: The single largest potential development in the Wharfe valley Area that is affected by this is the Sun Lane development of 500 homes, recently approved by the SoS for MHCLG. although NO WORK has commenced, the CIL agreement is supposed to cover this HUGE impact on the moor, with the accepted reality that BDMC will use the funds in areas of deprivation in the city centre.Shoukld be re-addressed.
4.19:The Figures printed in the local Plan Review you refer to are inaccurate. In Burley-in-Wharfedale they do not include the 92 Homes currently under initial construction works at the Greenholme Mill site.
4.20:Should be a greater weighting for properties within the 2.5km zone.
4.21The eventual number, after review & potential legal challenges, along with ONS reductions in forecast need, is likely to be more like 12,500. All funding formulae should utilise this figure to prevent having to repeat the excersise.

4.18: The single largest potential development in the Wharfe valley Area that is affected by this is the Sun Lane development of 500 homes, recently approved by the SoS for MHCLG. Although NO WORK has commenced, the CIL agreement is supposed to cover this HUGE impact on the moor, with the accepted reality that BDMC will use the funds in areas of deprivation in the city centre. This should be re-addressed.
4.19:The Figures printed in the local Plan Review you refer to are inaccurate. In Burley-in-Wharfedale they do not include the 92 Homes currently under initial construction works at the Greenholme Mill site.
4.20:Should be a greater weighting for properties within the 2.5km zone.
4.21The eventual number, after review & potential legal challenges, along with ONS reductions in forecast need, is likely to be more like 12,500. All funding formulae should utilise this figure to prevent having to repeat the exercise

4.18: The single largest potential development in the Wharfe valley Area that is affected by this is the Sun Lane development of 500 homes, recently approved by the SoS for MHCLG. Although NO WORK has commenced, the CIL agreement is supposed to cover this HUGE impact on the moor, with the accepted reality that BDMC will use the funds in areas of deprivation in the city centre. This should be re-addressed.
4.19:The Figures printed in the local Plan Review you refer to are inaccurate. In Burley-in-Wharfedale they do not include the 92 Homes currently under initial construction works at the Greenholme Mill site.
4.20:Should be a greater weighting for properties within the 2.5km zone.
4.21The eventual number, after review & potential legal challenges, along with ONS reductions in forecast need, is likely to be more like 12,500. All funding formulae should utilise this figure to prevent having to repeat the exercise.

4.18: The single largest potential development in the Wharfe Valley Area affected by this plan is the Sun Lane development of 500 homes, recently approved by the SoS for MHCLG. Although NO WORK has started, the CIL agreement is supposed to cover the HUGE impact on the moor, with the accepted reality that BDMC will use the funds in areas of deprivation in the city centre. This should be re-addressed.
4.19:The Figures printed in the local Plan Review you refer to are inaccurate. In Burley-in-Wharfedale they do not include the 92 Homes currently under initial construction at the Greenholme Mill site.
4.20: Should be a greater weighting for properties within the 2.5km zone.
4.21:The eventual number, after review & potential legal challenges, along with ONS reductions in forecast need, is likely to be more like 12,500. All funding formulae should use this figure to prevent having to repeat the exercise.

Presumably the CIL is supposed to pay for the mitigation of the Sun Lane development on the moor habitats. It will be taken by BDMC and spent elsewhere. It should be ring-fenced for its original purpose.
Housing figures in the Local Plan Review are wrong. That is a fact. The most glaring omission is the 92 homes well-under construction at Greenholme Mills have not been included in the figures. Huge error. Similarly the additional small scale developments of new homes (c. 20) in Burley-in-Wharfedale are not included. The number of homes on the Sun Lane development should at the very least be reduced to take account of the mathematical reality.