Appendix 2:
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 3290
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter
Appendix 2 effectivley highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelmibg volume of foot and vehickle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastiting consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.
Appendix 2 effectivley highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelmibg volume of foot and vehickle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastiting consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5248
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell
Appendix 2 effectively highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelming volume of foot and vehicle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastating consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.
Appendix 2 effectively highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelming volume of foot and vehicle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastating consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.
Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5325
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell
Appendix 2 effectively highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelming volume of foot and vehicle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastating consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.
Appendix 2 effectively highlights all of the dangers from developments taking place in close proximity to the SPC/SAC, and yet it then seems to rely on impact data gathered before the dreadful Moor Fires, before the covid travel restrictions created an overwhelming volume of foot and vehicle traffic up onto the SPA/SAC, and ignores the devastating consequences for the wildlife populations and for the protected Flora species for which the area is listed.
This is the Information that should have been at the Front of this review. This is the crucial part that sets the framework, that then identifies the proposed mitigation strategy as actively encouraging the horse to bolt, & then shutting the door, partially, behind it!
Again, time and again, your authors refer to outdated reference works, undertaken 10years into the last century! For a document with potentially such a profound effect, this is simply not good enough.