AD8/H - Church Street/Main Street

Support

Representation ID: 611

Received: 01/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Eleanor Phillips

Any proposed development would likely be an improvement on this eyesore.

Object

Representation ID: 900

Received: 07/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Alan Haigh

Bradford Council have through many years have neglected this site.

Support

Representation ID: 1628

Received: 15/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Jarvis

The current site is rather an eyesore, so I support the proposed development, as I recognise the need for more houses

Object

Representation ID: 1782

Received: 16/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Angela Hill

I do not wish to see more traffic on our roads nor the damage to the green belt.

Support

Representation ID: 1832

Received: 16/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Curtin

under utlised site that is part of the gateway to the dales that could be made better use of if done in keeping with the character of the village.

Support

Representation ID: 1942

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jane Welby

I have no problem with this other than to raise the concern that I feel that the village amenities are insufficient to cater for increased residency.
I would hate to see happen what has happened there since my childhood ,with dense populations and the demise of many green spaces. The impact is evident there with the joining up of towns and congestion with car use having a significant adverse effect on the environment. Addingham has historical interest and character but is already suffering from the volume of care ownership and use with subsequent congestion.

Support

Representation ID: 2033

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Professor Rick Battarbee

AD8/H Church St/Main St – This is a Brownfield site. It is acceptable for housing subject to:

• an ecological survey to identify & mitigate any environmental impacts identified; and
• the retention of mature trees along the boundary, especially the trees along the front of the plot that contribute to the local street character and those to the rear (west) of the site that form the boundary with the newly planted hedge in Hofmann Wood Field.

On behalf of Addingham Environment Group

Support

Representation ID: 2188

Received: 18/03/2021

Respondent: Dr Keith Bothamley

I support the use of this area for housing

Support

Representation ID: 2243

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Malcolm Secrett

It is acceptable for housing subject to:

• an ecological survey to identify & mitigate any environmental impacts identified; and
• the retention of mature trees along the boundary, especially the trees along the front of the plot that contribute to the local street character and those to the rear (west) of the site that form the boundary with the newly planted hedge in Hofmann Wood Field.

Support

Representation ID: 2630

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Partner

Development on brownfield sites should always be considered over green belt

Support

Representation ID: 2631

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Professor Robert Smith

Of all the sites in the proposed plan for Addingham, this is the one which would have my full support. It is brownfield, and from an access point of view is the least disruptive to village life. It would have my full support if this was to be turned over for housing purposes.

Support

Representation ID: 2644

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Partner

Development on brownfield sites should always be considered over green belt.

Support

Representation ID: 2679

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Kevin Nabb

We would be in favour of developing the land owned by Bradford Council near the cricket nets, again this will keep traffic on the periphery of the village and gives homeowners easy access to A65.

Object

Representation ID: 2701

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Lesley Barnard

While I accept that this site has now become an eyesore which does not enhance the approach to the village I believe that 8 houses is far too many for this plot.
Any development needs to be in keeping with the surrounding area and I don't believe this would be the case if 8 houses were allowed.
I suspect they would be 3 storey in order to squeeze so many in and that is not what that area needs.
Any plans should be very carefully considered before allowing this site to be developed and it should provide an inviting and positive impression at the entrance to our historic village.

Support

Representation ID: 2793

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Elizabeth Rutter

Subject to ecological survey

Object

Representation ID: 2814

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr William Johnston

This is a small site to accommodate the number of proposed houses and would be out of keeping with its surroundings.

Support

Representation ID: 2888

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Christine Makowski

Support subject to ecological survey and retention of trees .

Support

Representation ID: 2942

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David Hunter

Potential for a small development enhancing the approach to the village.

Support

Representation ID: 3134

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Carl McKeating

Good use of land and low impact on roads etc.

Support

Representation ID: 3272

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Keith Boothroyd

Any housing should a have a high environmental specification with some trees retained or replanted

Object

Representation ID: 3319

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Penny

Development of this site will lead to increased volumes of traffic and make the junction opposite Ilkley Road dangerous both to cross and drive on.

Support

Representation ID: 3454

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Olivia Charlesworth

Area hasn't fully re-wilded and has been left as a dumping ground. If there can be no plans to make a green space then housing may be appropriate.

Support

Representation ID: 3490

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David Johnston

An ideal site for development

Object

Representation ID: 3496

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Walters

Increased pressure on infrastructure drainage roads school and loss of village atmosphere

Support

Representation ID: 3586

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Barbara Millar

This site is on level ground a short walk from the centre of the village. This would make it easy for new residents to engage in village life. A car would not be essential making this a more sustainable site than many others in the proposed plan.

Support

Representation ID: 3625

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Anna Robinson

I feel that this site could be appropriately redeveloped and it has previously had accommodation on it. It is well hidden and would not distract from the village. I do feel that 8 houses is ambitious and development should be restricted to sustain the trees and wildlife that inhabit that space. Considerations should be given to this being a environmental development.

Support

Representation ID: 3626

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Susan Drysdale

Least worst option.

Support

Representation ID: 3884

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrew Hodgson

I fully support this site for housing.

Support

Representation ID: 3963

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Roger Seddon

This site is an unused scruffy dump and the village would benefit from its redevelopment.

Object

Representation ID: 4021

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ilkley Clean River Group

Ilkley Clean River Group (ICRG) object to this plan because of the adverse impact the new houses and supporting infrastructure will have on river water quality.
The combined sewage and drainage system is already overwhelmed and these new buildings will directly lead to a degradation in water quality through more unauthorised sewage discharges directly into the river in Ilkley.
The Addingham at Low Mill CSO flows directly into a dry stream which is already a health hazard and the sewage from these additional houses will make that worse.
SuDS mitigation plans for run-off water in neighbouring Ilkley have been shown to be inadequate as there is currently a challenge on the adequacy of these plans at the new Moss & Moor Garden Centre.
Note: the Addingham sewage system runs into the Ilkley sewage system (which is already overwhelmed) so we also object to the plans for new houses in Ilkley.