Consultation Question 14

Support

Representation ID: 294

Received: 19/02/2021

Respondent: Ms Mel Frances

I support the hierarchy of reuse. I do not support an incinerator in Keighley. There needs to be more education and incentive for people to reuse and recycle. We seem way behind other countries in this respect. There is also a massive issue of people dropping litter and fly tipping. It is an actual disgrace and is getting worse.

Object

Representation ID: 2758

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Helen Owen

Bradford should never have granted planning permission for the Incinerator at Marley. This decision makes nonsense of all the statements above.

Object

Representation ID: 3275

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Wilsden Parish Council

In light of the Climate Change Emergency we are disappointed that there is no reference in Policy SP 13 to the management of waste to minimise greenhouse gas emissions.

Object

Representation ID: 3681

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Representation ID: 3969

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Susan Burn

The proposed incinerator at Keighley should be stopped - it is not consistent with your proposed policy.

Support

Representation ID: 5382

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Jenkins

No comment

Comment

Representation ID: 9806

Received: 12/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

SP 13 Waste management is a key part of Local Authority responsibility and alongside identifying sites for management, we ought to review policies for collection with a view to reducing the amount that is merely dumped in our countryside. The other aspect is a national one of getting manufacturers to take responsibility for their products.

Comment

Representation ID: 15827

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA)

Priority 4 in the SEP, Infrastructure for Growth includes a commitment to ensuring a sufficient supply of minerals and waste infrastructure to sustain and support growth in housing, business and transport infrastructure.

In this capacity it is noted that the Plan includes a number of related policies and we would welcome engagement with Bradford on minerals and waste matters, such as making use of sub-regional evidence sources, including the West Yorkshire Waste Capacity and Needs Assessment Model.

Comment

Representation ID: 29187

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency

We encourage that the vision, strategy, policy and site allocations reflect the need for an integrated and adequate network of waste management facilities.

Please ensure that you follow the Waste Framework Directive objectives and relevant Articles.

We support and encourage a move away from landfilling / incineration (without energy recovery), toward reduction, reuse and recycling.

We encourage policies that promote the design of new development that enables the sustainable management of waste when the development is in use

An environmental permit may likely be a requirement and should be considered within the explanatory text.