Consultation Question 25

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 2765

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Helen Owen

Representation Summary:

Parking charges are a joke. If you want people to visit, stay. Spend money, don’t make parking so expensive.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3692

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

Representation Summary:

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 5412

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Jenkins

Representation Summary:

Good ideals

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 9812

Received: 12/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

Representation Summary:

TR4 Having leisure as a n objective is highly laudable. I am not quite sure what this will mean. Our main asset is our countryside and bus (even train) support of countryside access would be highly advantageous in improving access. Encouraging bus operators to allow cross ticketing between companies would help this and identifying destinations as countryside access sites would help.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 17296

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: The Great Northern Railway Trail Development Group

Representation Summary:

The Great Northern Railway Trail (GNRT) is in a tourist hotspot regarding the Bronte and railway heritage. The Bronte literary heritage caters for many visitors to the area. Both Haworth and Thornton hold strong connections with the Brontes. The GNRT already links Thornton, and the progression of the route will ensure that Haworth is also connected to provide another opportunity to encourage active travel.
The railway heritage is also strong in this Bronte country and our Trail, running along a former railway line, complements the existing Keighley and Worth Valley Railway and other railway attractions in the Keighley area.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28394

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Joint Committee (GNRTDG, Keighley Town Council & Parish Councils of Cullingworth, Denholme, Haworth, Cross Roads & Stanbury, and Wilsden

Representation Summary:

reat Northern Railway Trail is currently protected in the UDP & RUDP and planning permission has already been approved for the most part.

Thank the Council for their proposed continued protection of the route between Keighley and Queensbury and refer to policies SP7, SP10, SP11, SP14, SP15, SP16 and TR1, TR2, TR3 & TR4 in their support

Policy TR4: Transport and Tourism.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29063

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We support this Policy which seeks to improve access by sustainable modes of transport to the main tourist destinations of the District. We particularly welcome the intention that planning and development decisions and transport policies support sustainable access to tourist destinations, heritage and cultural assets and leisure uses, and especially that areas of cultural and heritage
significance should not be adversely affected by the impact of transport, in particular additional trips arising from development.