Consultation Question 25
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 2765
Received: 21/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Helen Owen
Parking charges are a joke. If you want people to visit, stay. Spend money, don’t make parking so expensive.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 3692
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe
he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.
Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 5412
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Peter Jenkins
Good ideals
Comment
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 9812
Received: 12/03/2021
Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)
TR4 Having leisure as a n objective is highly laudable. I am not quite sure what this will mean. Our main asset is our countryside and bus (even train) support of countryside access would be highly advantageous in improving access. Encouraging bus operators to allow cross ticketing between companies would help this and identifying destinations as countryside access sites would help.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 17296
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: The Great Northern Railway Trail Development Group
The Great Northern Railway Trail (GNRT) is in a tourist hotspot regarding the Bronte and railway heritage. The Bronte literary heritage caters for many visitors to the area. Both Haworth and Thornton hold strong connections with the Brontes. The GNRT already links Thornton, and the progression of the route will ensure that Haworth is also connected to provide another opportunity to encourage active travel.
The railway heritage is also strong in this Bronte country and our Trail, running along a former railway line, complements the existing Keighley and Worth Valley Railway and other railway attractions in the Keighley area.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 28394
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Joint Committee (GNRTDG, Keighley Town Council & Parish Councils of Cullingworth, Denholme, Haworth, Cross Roads & Stanbury, and Wilsden
reat Northern Railway Trail is currently protected in the UDP & RUDP and planning permission has already been approved for the most part.
Thank the Council for their proposed continued protection of the route between Keighley and Queensbury and refer to policies SP7, SP10, SP11, SP14, SP15, SP16 and TR1, TR2, TR3 & TR4 in their support
Policy TR4: Transport and Tourism.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 29063
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
We support this Policy which seeks to improve access by sustainable modes of transport to the main tourist destinations of the District. We particularly welcome the intention that planning and development decisions and transport policies support sustainable access to tourist destinations, heritage and cultural assets and leisure uses, and especially that areas of cultural and heritage
significance should not be adversely affected by the impact of transport, in particular additional trips arising from development.