Consultation Question 36

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3180

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Baildon Branch Labour Party

Representation Summary:

I support the policy but wonder if the future of the site at Esholt needs serious consideration in view of its under use.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3701

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

Representation Summary:

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3845

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Jenny Woodward

Representation Summary:

Gypsy and Travelling people suffer from very poor health, often related to the stress of finding somewhere to live and the poor quality of provision in terms of location. Please ensure adequate attention is given to this and that the provided sites allow healthy living.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 9813

Received: 12/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

Representation Summary:

HO 8 Gypsies travellers and show people – where?

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29071

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We support the requirement that proposals for sites for
gypsy and travellers should avoid significant adverse effects
upon the environment and incorporate appropriate design
and landscaping standards

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29679

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Leeds City Council

Representation Summary:

5. Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Show People

a. Since the CSPR (2019) consultation where Leeds City Council raised issues regarding the number of pitches proposed, Arc4 have carried out commissioned work and the Plan has increased the number of pitches required in discussion with GATE. This is welcomed. There is a call for sites as part of this consultation and therefore we wish to reserve our position on this until further evidence / information is provided through further consultation and duty to cooperate discussions.