Consultation Question 56

Object

Representation ID: 3713

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Representation ID: 29087

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

We support the intention that proposals for all waste
management facilities will be permitted provided that, there is an identified need for the facility, and it can be
demonstrated that any impacts of development will not
significantly adversely affect people, land, infrastructure,
natural resources and the historic environment. We also
support the requirement to submit a heritage statement
alongside planning applications where proposals will affect heritage assets

Comment

Representation ID: 29243

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency

The hierarchy of locations for development seems reasonable. We would suggest that surrounding land use is just as relevant as the development site itself. Expanding existing sites as well as development of new sites could present a host of problems in relation to off-site effects if in proximity to residential or other sensitive receptors – specifically in relation to amenity (dust, noise, odour) and impact of any incidents such as fire.
Please also note our comments below under ‘Development adjacent to regulated sites’ for additional information.

This section references minimising the impact of climate change. Does this include imposing a requirement for waste management developments to have plans for preventing impacts from materials held on their sites in the event of a flood or other extreme weather incident?
Under point 13D of the policy it states ‘For new or expanded hazardous waste management sites, it should be demonstrated that it could be processed at an existing facility within the district….’

Should this be read could NOT be processed at an existing facility.