Consultation Question 65

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 320

Received: 19/02/2021

Respondent: Ms Mel Frances

Representation Summary:

Street trees - yes!

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3300

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Wilsden Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We support the overall principles of Policy DS3 to create a strong Urban Character. Where a Neighbourhood Plan develops policies and design guides relating to the urban character of their area this should be considered as the primary expression of the local character.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 3722

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

Representation Summary:

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29095

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We support this Policy which will help in ensuring that
development proposals respond sensitively to their context
and, where appropriate, help to reinforce the distinctive
character of the area.