Consultation Question 75

Object

Representation ID: 7

Received: 08/02/2021

Respondent: Ms Rebekah Smith

There should be no development on the green belt. The area has already been decimated by large scale housing estates with no appropriate infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 10

Received: 08/02/2021

Respondent: Mrs Tracy Marson

The documentation and maps included within the report document are of such low resolution it is not possible to identify where they are correctly located geographically. As such, people can not fully review to make independent decisions on the proposals

Object

Representation ID: 236

Received: 08/02/2021

Respondent: Amanda Richards

Loss of green belt and greenfield sites and implications on environment, wildlife, drainage and flooding

Object

Representation ID: 493

Received: 25/02/2021

Respondent: Mr Neil Collins

Bradford has a plentiful supply of brownfield sites that have not been developed.
In her judgement dated 8/6/2020 in Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum vs Leeds City Council, Mrs Justice Lieven found that it was wrong to leave Green Belt sites in a development plan solely because the Council wished to reduce the numbers around the district proportionately. Green belt should be removed from the plan and brownfield sites built on first.
This judgement is surely just as relevant to Bradford.
Our Prime Minister's "Build Build Build" announcement on 30/6/2020 said brownfield building would be made easier to protect Green Belt. This should be bourne in mind and our Green Belt not built on.

Comment

Representation ID: 1609

Received: 15/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Daniel Goodyear

We are supportive of the need for new housing in parts of the district where there hasn't been developments - there has already been significant developments in these areas already putting a strain on local facilities and provisions such as Doctors, Schools etc. It is vitally important for the current and future generations that we we retain and improve the quality of open spaces and sports facilities in the area and support for the creation of new natural and formal open spaces together with improved connections between open areas - NE2/3 has a football training pitch currently there.

Areas such as Idle Moor itself need to be designated as protected open space to be used as a natural habitat for wildlife and for the provision of exercise for the benefit of peoples physical and mental health.

Comment

Representation ID: 2591

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Tracy Marson

Concern regarding the status change and varied descriptions given for Idle Moor. 2005 RUDP allocated this area with the same designation as the now 'Green infrastructure corridor' along Wrosecliffe and Westfield Lane. A section of Idle Moor has since succumbed to housing in 2019. The remainder of Idle Moor is no longer designated as part of the 'Green Infrastructure Corridor. Figure 6 in the report allocates Idle Moor as 'Open Land in Settlements'. The Local Area Strategy Plan for Wrose, Idle & Thackley has Idle Moor as 'Open Space - Sport & Recreation'. We are concerned that this change in designation and differing descriptions will allow the current intrusive drilling and surveying on Idle Moor to progress into another housing development off an already busy Green Lane. Loosing another local Green space that is used and appreciated for local wildlife and exercise/time in an Green space by the local residents.

Support

Representation ID: 2634

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Ben Donaldson

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
I would request Bradford Council to reconsider whether or not there would be any adverse impacts if planning permission is granted for the green field site on Idle Moor. (Potentially Gleason Homes)
The green fields at the top of idle moor are and should be a protected green field natural site for both families and wildlife. Foxes and animals regularly frequent this area.
Whilst this are provides an area of use that similar to Thackley Woods. I oppose any building on this area as this would be detrimental to the lush green beauty of the area.

Support

Representation ID: 2972

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Tyne

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
Not outright objecting, referring to the land known as Idle Moor and concern as to various descriptions used within the draft plan. I want the designation of this land to be clear within the plan. I am in support of the land known as Idle Moor being an open space for recreational use, to be protected for its biodiversity and as part of the green infrastructure corridor. I am against development on this land. It is well used for recreation by the local community helping with physical and mental wellbeing. The public rights of way are well used. We need to protect and retain this natural open space for all the local community and wildlife to continue to benefit from its natural habitat.

Support

Representation ID: 2984

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Dean Tyne

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
Land known as Idle Moor (various adjoining fields) It isn't clear within different parts of the plan what this area is proposed to be designated as. I am in support of this area of land being protected as an open space for recreation. It is widely used for its public rights of way and for recreation, benefitting the physical and mental wellbeing of the local community. It is a natural habitat for many species. We need to protect and retain this green open space from development. There is limited green natural accessible open space in this locality. Vehicle access to this land to develop it would be difficult.

Support

Representation ID: 2988

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon Marson

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
As a resident I am very keen for Idle Moor to remain as an urban green space for recreation and natural habitat for local wildlife. The description allocated in draft plan is vague and does not protect this area from potential planning to build on, It is vital to have open space for exercise to promote health and well-being for local residents. I feel if this area of moorland can be safeguarded against potential planning to build by securing an open area of designated green space for recreation and exercise it will protect key areas highlighted. NO building .

Comment

Representation ID: 2998

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gill Taylor

I have grave concerns about the redesignation of Idle Moor from a Green Corridor. This space is an essential green space, providing oxygen for a large urban area, habitats for wildlife and open space which is used daily by children, families, dog walkers, pensioners, all greatly benefiting from the physical and mental health benefits of a local green space.
The change of designation seems to leave open the possibility of building on this Green Corridor, which would be devastating in the short term, and with our planet’s climate emergency, unforgivable in the long term.

Support

Representation ID: 3000

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Bussey

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
A few years ago a new development of three story houses were built nearby, and then a couple of years ago the huge new estate on Sandhill Fold took place. Two years of noise, dust, dirt, heavy transport up and down Green Lane - hell for local residents. Now you are considering building more houses on green space on Idle Moor. Furthermore, I believe if building permission was granted access would been via Kenstone Crescent which would be nigh on impossible due to the narrow winding road and sharp turn to the access point. The land is also clearly unsuitable for building on holding a large quantity of water under the surface. Please leave us alone - we are sick of new builds around here.

Support

Representation ID: 3004

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Green

It is of paramount importance that any green space in the area is maintained to enable the bridging of habitat populations that are being fragmented by the development of housing, roads and associated infrastructure.
The larger these corridors the more effective they will be increasing bio diversity.
The current green areas have provided a vital support for the mental and physical well-being of local residents during COVID restrictions. It is vital to maintain the footpaths and bridle ways that traverse the area as they provide safe recreational opportunities and help mitigate the negative effects of the city environment.
The green spaces help offset the environmental impact of the large number of developments, improve urban ventilation and and make help in the fight against climate change.
Rather than taking the green space in Wrose, Idle and Thackley for developments, the green space should be developed and boosted!

Support

Representation ID: 3050

Received: 21/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Holmes

I do have reservations about the housing proposals for the area, as 6 of the 8 proposed are on greenfield sites with the remaining 2, 1 is on mixed greenfield / brownfield leaving only a single brownfield site being proposed for re-use. Surely it ought to be possible to re-use more brownfield sites instead of using greenfield? Once greenfield sites are gone, they are gone for good.
I would like to support the proposed keeping of as much green belt and green open space as possible as the current pandemic has shown that we need to protect these spaces for local recreation.

Support

Representation ID: 3312

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Alison Jack

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
Too much open/green space has been used for building in Idle, and in Bradford too, already. Idle Moor has been shrunk way too much. The Pandemic has proven the need for recreational open green areas for walking and observing nature. Once this has been taken away and built on it will never come back. There are lots and lots of derelict buildings and brown field sites that are not being used for development. Why? Because the builders don't find them as profitable! If you are building for need and not greed then all the brown field sites should be fully exhausted before any green fields sites are even considered.
The centre of Bradford is a disgrace. Trees growing out of buildings that have been left to decay for years.
Before I run over the word limit, this website appears to be set to deter comments. NOT USER FRIENDLY!

Support

Representation ID: 3820

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Katie Yeadon

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
High number of developments on greenfield sites in the idle and Thackley area in recent years. (Idle Moor, cote farm)
Idle Moor should not be considered for further development as it is a green open space. It is very popular since lockdown for families and dog walkers. Important for both mental and physical well-being for Local people. Loss of this green space will push locals into use of cars to travel to other areas for these activities. This and the distance of the development from the main roads and amenities will also increase carbon emissions.

Support

Representation ID: 3843

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Gartland

It is important to protect what is left of the green space around the Wrose, Thackley and Idle areas. In recent times there has been prolific building of new homes, generally not social housing, without the investment in associated infrastructure required to support such developments, such as for example schools, playing fields and green space.

No more development on green space please. Develop on brownfield sites only.

Support

Representation ID: 3899

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Aaron Irving

I would like to keep green spaces open

Support

Representation ID: 3958

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Baxendale

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
There has in the last several years been too many developments taking place on Idle Moor. There hasn't been any improvements to the road infrastructure other than a suggested traffic calming idea that had seventy three objections. Any further development will only result in additional traffic which will only worsen the situation. Any development would destroy more green belt land and restrict the footpaths on Idle Moor. During the pandemic I can confirm that these footpaths have been extensively used for exercise and for wellbeing. It would be inexcusable to hinder or curtail the ability of people to continue to enjoy and deserve this open area.

Support

Representation ID: 3986

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Karen Benazaize

Please maintain all remaining green spaces. We have already lost much of our green spaces to house building and need to protect what green space is left for the health and well being of our residents.

Support

Representation ID: 3991

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Susan Williams

Idle needs the green space of Idle Moor now more than ever and there isn't the infrastructure to support any additional housing being built in this area. Totally support these plans.

Support

Representation ID: 4023

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janette Watmough

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
I want to allow the green belt in idle remain and not to allow anymore building houses.
We have very little green belt remaining and we want to keep that for us to enjoy open green space .

Support

Representation ID: 4060

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David Robertson

5.2.40 states that "Bradford North East is characterised by densely populated urban landscape..."
5.2.44 states that "there is a significant deficit in open space in this settlement overall...."
Very true, we feel the lack of open space, especially following years of housing development.

Support

Representation ID: 4139

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emma Lister

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
The traffic up Green Lane has increased significantly, containing to build on Idle Moor will only continue to create significant environmental impacts beyond the loss of Green spaces.

Having these Green spaces are essential for a good balanced environment and ensuring that parts of Idle Moor remain for wild animals is so important. I have recently seen Red Kites hunting in this area as well as seeing other birds of prey including owls and sparrow hawks. If we remove their hunting grounds we remove their ability to thrive and grow. We also have many other wild animals, birds and insects living in this area.

Developers have already cut down brushland which is essential nesting habitat; I am particularly concerned about the brush and trees that are left as we move into nesting season; disturbing nesting birds is illegal and a whole generation of birds could be lost!

Support

Representation ID: 4267

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ben Donaldson

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
I request that Bradford Council reject any planning permission or reconsider the notion to allow dwellings to be built on the Green Space that is next to Sandhill Fold opposite Westfield Lane.

The Green Space which is a haven for natural beauty and offers many benefits to both humans and wildlife would be detrimental to the area. This has offered a space for families and wildlife to foster and should not be destroyed by more houses on an area that overlooks Idle Hill.

This area is providing members of the public and nearby home owners a similar respite and has similar features to that of Thackley Woods.

Most importantly Wildlife flourishes here with Foxes and other animals frequenting the area. This is clear reason for objection.

Support

Representation ID: 4278

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emma Bascombe

Please keep our green spaces. So much wildlife and history to conserve for future generations.

Support

Representation ID: 4649

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Daniel Hardcastle

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
It’s important to keep the are as green space for our children to enjoy. There is not much other space locally.

Support

Representation ID: 4658

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emma Hardcastle

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
The field is a great open space for the local community for exercise, fresh air, dog walking and the children love being able to run freely without the risks of roads/cars etc.

Support

Representation ID: 4782

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Steve Wilson

(Local Plan Team – Comments relate to Support for Idle Moor as greenspace as currently proposed with specific comments below by user)
In 2015 a Government Inspector overturned several Council refusals to build on Idle Moor; citing harm to the environment and lack of schools amongst other reasons, he still sided with the developer. This caused a very long period of misery for locals with a daily procession of HGVs carrying concrete to the site, given its poor stability.
Now we see surveyors on the next field. Much has been made of the value of green space in the pandemic and the need to build back on brownfield land. Equally, the plane suggests the requirements of Bradford East are broadly in place so there is no need for this field to be lost.

Support

Representation ID: 4785

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Louise Holmes

We need to keep the fields on idle moor as green open space. In lockdown they have been a lifeline to those who live nearby and dog walkers as a source of exercise and wellbeing. The area is already over developed, with no schools and too much traffic (especially in the snow). Need to extend the green infrastructure corridor to include idle moor not just for the residents of bradford who have now very little open space locally to enjoy but also for the wildlife who are having their habitats destroyed. Land should be used to plant trees - as Bradford council keep saying on country file that they’re a green council who cares, yet this clearly isn’t the case when all our green open space nearby is used for building new houses that the area can’t cope with. Green open space is what the people of Bradford need.