Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 3279

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter

Representation Summary:

Baines, in 1988, & Robson, in 1998 are both essentially out of date as reference works to Curlew populations. The Curlew Recovery Partnership should be approached as a matter of urgency for their input into this work.
It is notable that DEFRA, MHCLG, and Natural England are actively involved , and funding this work.It would be a missed opportunity for this review to FAIL to take the latest information into consideration.
To reference Hoskin Panter & lilley, and the HRA they produced this last year without it being published for the public to review its findings & see their appropriateness is not common practice.

Full text:

Baines, in 1988, & Robson, in 1998 are both essentially out of date as reference works to Curlew populations. The Curlew Recovery Partnership should be approached as a matter of urgency for their input into this work.
It is notable that DEFRA, MHCLG, and Natural England are actively involved , and funding this work.It would be a missed opportunity for this review to FAIL to take the latest information into consideration.
To reference Hoskin Panter & lilley, and the HRA they produced this last year without it being published for the public to review its findings & see their appropriateness is not common practice.