Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5893
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson
4.28 seems to accept the CIL is a poor way of trying to fund mitigation work. Why is it still being suggested then?
4.29 suggests the developer will have to pay at the start of work. This should most definitely happen. The council should stand-up to the developer when they try to renege.
4.36 is a disaster. There should not be any question of an instalment system. This would completely undermine the use of the Standardised Unilateral Form!
4.28 seems to accept the CIL is a poor way of trying to fund mitigation work. Why is it still being suggested then?
4.29 suggests the developer will have to pay at the start of work. This should most definitely happen. The council should stand-up to the developer when they try to renege.
4.36 is a disaster. There should not be any question of an instalment system. This would completely undermine the use of the Standardised Unilateral Form!