Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Object

Representation ID: 2421

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

The area strategy and allocations proposed for Baildon are based on a fundamentally flawed Green Belt Review where Arup has inconsistently applied ratings to sites. As such this evidence base and the resultant proposed allocations fail to meet the policy test for release. Further details set out on the appended objection.

Object

Representation ID: 2422

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

The parcel makes a significant contribution to the openness of the green belt and the green belt assessment has not taken account of this. This could be addressed by revising the shape and size of the site.
From attachment and summarised by Local Plan Team

Object

Representation ID: 2423

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

From attachment, interpreted by Local Plan Team
The release and the development of the site is likely to be politically sensitive and as such is not deliverable

Object

Representation ID: 2424

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

Site specific comments taken from attachment which contains more information -
Development of this site will create a significant negative impact on the openness of the Green Belt. The site fails to meet the policy test for release and should be removed from the proposed Allocations DPD

Object

Representation ID: 2425

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

From attachment and summarised by Local Plan Team
The parcel makes a significant contribution to the openness of the green belt and the green belt assessment has not taken account of this. This could be addressed by revising the shape and size of the site

Object

Representation ID: 6794

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

Summary provided by Local Plan Team
Flawed green belt methodology with the failure to allocate SLA site BA/004 as a preferred option housing site. Further information provided in the attachment

Object

Representation ID: 13233

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

The area strategy and allocations proposed for Baildon are based on a fundamentally flawed Green Belt Review where Arup has inconsistently applied ratings to sites. As such this evidence base and the resultant proposed allocations fail to meet the policy test for release. Further details set out on the appended objection.
See attachment for further information

Object

Representation ID: 13243

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

The parcel makes a significant contribution to the openness of the green belt and the green belt assessment has not taken account of this. This could be addressed by revising the shape and size of the site.
From attachment and summarised by Local Plan Team
See attachment for further information

Object

Representation ID: 13244

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Pennythorn Limited

The area strategy and allocations proposed for Baildon are based on a fundamentally flawed Green Belt Review where Arup has inconsistently applied ratings to sites. As such this evidence base and the resultant proposed allocations fail to meet the policy test for release. Further details set out on the appended objection.
See attachment for further information