Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Search representations

Results for Creative Sales Team Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

AD1/H - Turner Lane

Representation ID: 25042

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Creative Sales Team Ltd

Representation Summary:

Allocation of 175 properties is more than previously agreed – how was this calculated? It is out proportion to the settlement’s size. Many brownfield sites the Bradford area that are more sustainable options.

Four sites mean potentially 160 additional vehicles causing potential danger to residents.

Drainage/flooding is an issue. Existing system is dated and cannot cope now, resulting in flooding. Significant investment to drains would be required.

Will severely impact on village’s character/appearance. Area supports wildlife, including Curlews. Within overlapping zones of North & South Pennines SPA/SAC. Foraging bird areas not taken into account. NPPF Green Belt “exceptional circumstances” test not passed. Will impact on long distance footpath.

No employment and few amenities. School is over-subscribed. Due to location, children are unlikely to walk, meaning more cars using congested roads.

No railway station. Parking at nearby stations is not have adequate to meet current/future demands. Buses are unreliable and stop is distant from the site.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

AD2/H - Parsons Lane

Representation ID: 25072

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Creative Sales Team Ltd

Representation Summary:

Four sites mean potentially 160 additional vehicles in the area causing potential danger to residents.

Will severely impact on village’s character/appearance. Area supports wildlife, including Curlews. Within overlapping zones of North & South Pennines SPA/SAC. Foraging bird areas not taken into account. NPPF Green Belt “exceptional circumstances” test not passed. Will impact on long distance footpath.

Drainage/flooding is an issue. Existing system is dated and cannot cope now, resulting in flooding. Significant investment to drains would be required.

Allocation of 175 properties is more than previously agreed – how was this calculated? It is out proportion to the settlement’s size. Many brownfield sites the Bradford area that are far more sustainable option.

No employment and few amenities. School is over-subscribed. Due to location, children are unlikely to walk to school, meaning more cars using congested roads.

No railway station. Nearby stations do not have adequate parking to meet current/future demands. Buses are unreliable and stop is distant from the sites.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

AD6/H - Moor Lane

Representation ID: 25073

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Creative Sales Team Ltd

Representation Summary:

Will severely impact on village’s character/appearance. Area supports wildlife, including Curlews. Within overlapping zones of North & South Pennines SPA/SAC. Foraging bird areas not taken into account. NPPF Green Belt “exceptional circumstances” test not passed. Will impact on long distance footpath.

Drainage/flooding is an issue. Existing system is dated and cannot cope now, resulting in flooding. Significant investment to drains would be required.

Allocation of 175 properties is more than previously agreed – how was this calculated? It is out proportion to the settlement’s size. Many brownfield sites the Bradford area that are far more sustainable option.

Four sites mean potentially 160 additional vehicles in the area causing potential danger to residents.

No employment and few amenities. School is over-subscribed. Due to location, children are unlikely to walk to school, meaning more cars using congested roads.

No railway station. Nearby stations do not have adequate parking to meet current/future demands. Buses are unreliable and stop is distant from the sites.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

AD7/H - Turner Lane/Silsden Road

Representation ID: 25074

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Creative Sales Team Ltd

Representation Summary:

Four sites mean potentially 160 additional vehicles in the area causing potential danger to residents.

Will severely impact on village’s character/appearance. Area supports wildlife, including Curlews. Within overlapping zones of North & South Pennines SPA/SAC. Foraging bird areas not taken into account. NPPF Green Belt “exceptional circumstances” test not passed. Will impact on long distance footpath.

Drainage/flooding is an issue. Existing system is dated and cannot cope now, resulting in flooding. Significant investment to drains would be required.

Allocation of 175 properties is more than previously agreed – how was this calculated? It is out proportion to the settlement’s size. Many brownfield sites the Bradford area that are far more sustainable option.

No employment and few amenities. School is over-subscribed. Due to location, children are unlikely to walk to school, meaning more cars using congested roads.

No railway station. Nearby stations do not have adequate parking to meet current/future demands. Buses are unreliable and stop is distant from the sites.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Consultation Question 116

Representation ID: 30296

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Creative Sales Team Ltd

Representation Summary:

-Allocation of 175 properties is more than previously agreed – how was this calculated? It is out proportion to the settlement’s size.
-Many brownfield sites the Bradford area that are more sustainable options.
-Four sites mean potentially 160 additional vehicles causing potential danger to residents.
-Drainage/flooding is an issue. Existing system is dated and cannot cope now, resulting in flooding. Significant investment to drains would be required.
-Will severely impact on village’s character/appearance. -Area supports wildlife, including Curlews.
-Within overlapping zones of North & South Pennines SPA/SAC. Foraging bird areas not taken into account.
-NPPF Green Belt “exceptional circumstances” test not passed. Will impact on long distance footpath.
-No employment and few amenities.
-School is over-subscribed. Due to location, children are unlikely to walk, meaning more cars using congested roads.
-No railway station.
-Parking at nearby stations is not have adequate to meet current/future demands.
-Buses are unreliable and stop is distant from the site.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.