Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Search representations

Results for Woodland Trust search

New search New search

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

KY26/H - Hainworth Road

Representation ID: 13458

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

SE20/H - Dean Beck Avenue

Representation ID: 13459

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

Conclusion

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

SW14/H - Fenwick Drive, Woodside

Representation ID: 13460

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

Conclusion

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

SW34/H - Meadway, Wibsey

Representation ID: 13461

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

Conclusion

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

NW19/H - Bingley Road/Long Lane, Heaton

Representation ID: 13462

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

Conclusion

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

BA1/H - Stubbings Road

Representation ID: 13463

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

Conclusion

The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocations will have in relation to areas of ancient woodland within and/or adjacent to site allocations. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.

The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of the below site allocations as they are likely to cause damage and/or loss to areas of ancient woodland within or adjacent to their boundaries. For this reason, we believe the sites in the table overleaf are unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.