Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Search representations
Results for Holden Gate Investments LTD search
New searchObject
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 93
Representation ID: 1207
Received: 22/02/2021
Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD
Objection based on failure to allocate clients site (SLA ref: NW/031A - Hazel Walk, Daisy Hill) when adjacent site has been allocated.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 84
Representation ID: 4910
Received: 11/03/2021
Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD
Objection to the failure to allocate SE/098 - Wyke Mills, Huddersfield Road, Wyke
All I seek is this 8-acre site to be considered as a future potential residential or mixed residential/commercial opportunity. Although currently, various mill buildings, all tenanted, these buildings are elderly and the basis of occupation short-term. Furthermore, the land is now really a non-conforming user being surrounded predominately by either residential or woodland. All nearby land recently developed has been for residential purposes.
As I say, on behalf of the owners of this land, all I seek is your re-consideration of this superb potential residential opportunity as it is not included in the draft local plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) which was issued in February of this year. That seemed most surprising.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 111
Representation ID: 5102
Received: 19/03/2021
Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD
Objection to the failure to allocate site KY/039 (Banks Lane Riddlesden)
The land is about 3 acres and would be very suitable for residential development, given its frontage to a road and its south-facing orientation and the fact that it is abutting residential development on 3 sides.
I notice with some concern that this land was not allocated in your recent Draft Allocations Plan Document, issued in early February, for residential development and the purpose of this email is to ask if reconsideration to that could be undertaken so that in the next issue documentation, this land is proposed for residential development purposes for which it is ideally suited.