Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Search representations

Results for Holden Gate Investments LTD search

New search New search

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Consultation Question 93

Representation ID: 1207

Received: 22/02/2021

Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD

Representation Summary:

Objection based on failure to allocate clients site (SLA ref: NW/031A - Hazel Walk, Daisy Hill) when adjacent site has been allocated.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Consultation Question 84

Representation ID: 4910

Received: 11/03/2021

Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD

Representation Summary:

Objection to the failure to allocate SE/098 - Wyke Mills, Huddersfield Road, Wyke

All I seek is this 8-acre site to be considered as a future potential residential or mixed residential/commercial opportunity. Although currently, various mill buildings, all tenanted, these buildings are elderly and the basis of occupation short-term. Furthermore, the land is now really a non-conforming user being surrounded predominately by either residential or woodland. All nearby land recently developed has been for residential purposes.

As I say, on behalf of the owners of this land, all I seek is your re-consideration of this superb potential residential opportunity as it is not included in the draft local plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) which was issued in February of this year. That seemed most surprising.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Consultation Question 111

Representation ID: 5102

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Holden Gate Investments LTD

Representation Summary:

Objection to the failure to allocate site KY/039 (Banks Lane Riddlesden)

The land is about 3 acres and would be very suitable for residential development, given its frontage to a road and its south-facing orientation and the fact that it is abutting residential development on 3 sides.

I notice with some concern that this land was not allocated in your recent Draft Allocations Plan Document, issued in early February, for residential development and the purpose of this email is to ask if reconsideration to that could be undertaken so that in the next issue documentation, this land is proposed for residential development purposes for which it is ideally suited.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.