Support
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 27913
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
It should be noted that the flow chart (Figure 2) in paragraph 3.3 is not correct where it references supporting habitat. For the reasons set out above there can be no a Likely Significant Effect if it can be demonstrated through empirical evidence that SPA birds are not present on a development site (see above). The flow chart does not allow for this possibility. It should also be made clear that the LSE test is not whether there are effect upon supporting habitat but rather whether there are effects on the interest features of the SPA birds as a result of effects on supporting habitat.
See attachments of CEG’s representation to the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) Consultation. This includes:
-Appendix 1 Assessment of the Housing Requirement proposed within Policy SP8
-Appendix 2 Commentary on Evidence Base Documents
-Appendix 3 The Secretary of State’s decision and Inspector’s Report regarding application
16/07870/MAO (reference APP/W4705/V/18/3208020)
-Appendix 4 Burley-in-Wharfedale Alternative Site Assessment (2016)
-Appendix 5 Burley-in-Wharfedale Updated Alternative Site Assessment (April 2019)
-Appendix 6 Scalebor Park Land Registry Extract
-Appendix 7 Response to the HRA, associated policies and the South Pennine Moors
SPA/SAC Planning Framework SPD (prepared by Baker Consultants