Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5880
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson
Presumably the CIL is supposed to pay for the mitigation of the Sun Lane development on the moor habitats. It will be taken by BDMC and spent elsewhere. It should be ring-fenced for its original purpose.
Housing figures in the Local Plan Review are wrong. That is a fact. The most glaring omission is the 92 homes well-under construction at Greenholme Mills have not been included in the figures. Huge error. Similarly the additional small scale developments of new homes (c. 20) in Burley-in-Wharfedale are not included. The number of homes on the Sun Lane development should at the very least be reduced to take account of the mathematical reality.
Presumably the CIL is supposed to pay for the mitigation of the Sun Lane development on the moor habitats. It will be taken by BDMC and spent elsewhere. It should be ring-fenced for its original purpose.
Housing figures in the Local Plan Review are wrong. That is a fact. The most glaring omission is the 92 homes well-under construction at Greenholme Mills have not been included in the figures. Huge error. Similarly the additional small scale developments of new homes (c. 20) in Burley-in-Wharfedale are not included. The number of homes on the Sun Lane development should at the very least be reduced to take account of the mathematical reality.