NW10/H - Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane

Object

Representation ID: 219

Received: 16/02/2021

Respondent: Ms Kirstin Sawyer

Green belt land should not be built on - it should be preserved to promote clean air and support people’ mental health and well-being.

Object

Representation ID: 700

Received: 03/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Joseph Wood

This land helps stop the allerton and sandy lane from becoming one entity which could easily happen

Support

Representation ID: 1240

Received: 10/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Frances Nichol

The proposed site is very unsightly in its present state development would improve the visual appearance of the area. The site has excellent transport links as it is on a busy bus route to Bingley and Bradford. Access to the site is excellent as it is off a main road there is also space to improve the road infrastructure if needed for example a roundabout. There is not many homes which would be affected by the land been developed.

Support

Representation ID: 1241

Received: 10/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Jackson

The land is an eye sore.
Good bus links
Access via the main road
Already houses around the area so will make the area nicer

Support

Representation ID: 1245

Received: 10/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Dankowycz

Nw10 The site is extremely unattractive and just looks like waste land now. The site seems to have good access from the main road.

Object

Representation ID: 1414

Received: 13/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Stephanie Knight

I object to Green Belt development in an area with already overcrowded roads. Green Belt Should only be developed in very special circumstances and I see no evidence that there are any. Brownfield sites should be maximised more aggressively.

Object

Representation ID: 3744

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Sandy Lane Parish Council

Sandy Lane Parish Council object strongly to the proposed development of this site to house 160 dwellings: in addition to the highly significant 'constraints' detailed below, the Parish Council's concerns regard the Plans’ impact on existing services and facilities, transport, access for sites, flood risk, and impact on heritage sites such as listed buildings locally. Specifically the Parish Council’s concerns are focused upon any further development in the parish with no infrastructure to support this - there is already an over-subscribed school, and no doctors - as well as the existing highways limitations, the fact that this is Green Belt land, and the flood risk. The flood risk is an imperative objection in this already built up area, where there are several areas subject to surface water flooding, which further development in the area would only serve to acerbate.

Object

Representation ID: 4956

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dr Mahdiyar Nejadhamzeeigilani

The wildlife of the surrounding area has already significantly been negatively affected by the housing development on Allerton Lane over the past few years. NW8/H and NW10/H both lie within the green belt and it would be a disgrace if these project went ahead. I have lost count of the number of injured wildlife which is a direct result of nearby housing projects, most recently a barn owl that was euthanised by the RSPCA due to injury near the new builds. No amount of " incorporating on or off site contributions to support protected species" would make up for the negative impact these projects will have! Also, by building on these green belt areas, you are ending potential agricultural improvements and jobs that the lands provide, in turn destroying the income and livelihood of the local people!

Object

Representation ID: 8139

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: CPRE West Yorkshire

In line with our comments on policy SP5, we object to these site allocations:
NW7/H
NW8/H
NW9/H
NW10/H
NW13/H
NW19/H - Considering the recognition of the site’s parkland setting, in our view the site is unsuitable for development at sufficient density to constitute sustainable development, and it should not therefore be allocated

Object

Representation ID: 13364

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jac Morton

I would also like to bring to your attention that site NW10/H Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane - 160 is being built on green belt land, which will again have a huge impact on the open space which is a key characteristic of Allerton, and will forever change the identity of the settlement.

Support

Representation ID: 17028

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katie Heptonstall

I would also like to register my support for the proposed development at Wilsden Road/West Avenue Sandy Lane and Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane.

Support

Representation ID: 18925

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs WE Nichol

Agent: Carter Jonas

The site is fully ‘deliverable’ within the meaning of The Framework.

The land within our clients ownership is available.

It is well related to the urban area and enjoys high levels of accessibility to jobs and services.

Its development would not have a significant detrimental impact on the form and character of the settlement.

The land is not subject to any policy constraints or heritage, ecological, environmental or landscape designations.

The site is located within Flood Zone 1, has a low probability of fluvial flooding and any risks of surface water flooding could be managed by sustainable drainage measures (SuDs).

The site is bordered by residential development and therefore the allocation of the site for housing is fully compatible with the surrounding land uses.

An appropriate access could be achieved from Prune Park Lane.

The site is capable of delivering a range of housing types and tenures (including affordable) within the first 5 years of the Plan period.

Support

Representation ID: 18935

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs J Kamyar

Agent: Carter Jonas

The site is fully ‘deliverable’ within the meaning of The Framework.

The land within our clients ownership is available.

It is well related to the urban area and enjoys high levels of accessibility to jobs and services.

Its development would not have a significant detrimental impact on the form and character of the settlement.

The land is not subject to any policy constraints or heritage, ecological, environmental or landscape designations.

The site is located within Flood Zone 1, has a low probability of fluvial flooding and any risks of surface water flooding could be managed by sustainable drainage measures (SuDs).

The site is bordered by residential development and therefore the allocation of the site for housing is fully compatible with the surrounding land uses.

An appropriate access could be achieved from Prune Park Lane.

The site is capable of delivering a range of housing types and tenures (including affordable) within the first 5 years of the Plan period.

Support

Representation ID: 18945

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs I Wood

Agent: Carter Jonas

The site is fully ‘deliverable’ within the meaning of The Framework.

The land within our clients ownership is available.

It is well related to the urban area and enjoys high levels of accessibility to jobs and services.

Its development would not have a significant detrimental impact on the form and character of the settlement.

The land is not subject to any policy constraints or heritage, ecological, environmental or landscape designations.

The site is located within Flood Zone 1, has a low probability of fluvial flooding and any risks of surface water flooding could be managed by sustainable drainage measures (SuDs).

The site is bordered by residential development and therefore the allocation of the site for housing is fully compatible with the surrounding land uses.

An appropriate access could be achieved from Prune Park Lane.

The site is capable of delivering a range of housing types and tenures (including affordable) within the first 5 years of the Plan period.

Support

Representation ID: 18955

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr GRN Jones

Agent: Carter Jonas

The site is fully ‘deliverable’ within the meaning of The Framework.

The land within our clients ownership is available.

It is well related to the urban area and enjoys high levels of accessibility to jobs and services.

Its development would not have a significant detrimental impact on the form and character of the settlement.

The land is not subject to any policy constraints or heritage, ecological, environmental or landscape designations.

The site is located within Flood Zone 1, has a low probability of fluvial flooding and any risks of surface water flooding could be managed by sustainable drainage measures (SuDs).

The site is bordered by residential development and therefore the allocation of the site for housing is fully compatible with the surrounding land uses.

An appropriate access could be achieved from Prune Park Lane.

The site is capable of delivering a range of housing types and tenures (including affordable) within the first 5 years of the Plan period.

Support

Representation ID: 27956

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited

Agent: Barton Wilmore

Fully support the allocation of site NW10/H for residential purposes. The site is available, achievable and suitable and represents a developable and eliverable site, which would round-off the settlement of Allerton, with minimal impact on the Green Belt.

Should the site be allocated, it is envisaged that a planning application for 75-80 new homes will be submitted following the adoption of the Local Plan. Other than the delivery of the initial site infrastructure we are confident that there are no other major infrastructure works that need to take place prior to the commencement of delivery of new homes on the site. Accordingly, the development will commence within a year of the submission of the planning application. Due to the site’s size, there would be one development/selling outlet delivering new homes at the site. It is therefore anticipated that the development will deliver a yield of at least 40 homes per annum. The development proposals can therefore deliver significant benefits to Allerton and the wider District within the first five-year period of the Local Plan, alongside making a significant contribution to the Council’s ongoing 5-year housing land supply requirements.
The anticipated submission of a pre-application enquiry prior to the examination of the Local Plan will help to
ensure that the deliverability timescales outlined above are met.

Support

Representation ID: 28304

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: Johnson Mowat

This response supports the inclusion of Site NW10/H but objects to the non-identification of the remaining extent of Site NW/024.

Both site NW10/H and the wider extent of Site NW/024 are deliverable, unconstrained housing sites capable of delivering housing to meet the identified housing requirement.

There are no known viability issues and both sites could deliver the full S106 requirements and other planning obligations in the Draft Local Plan.

There are no environmental constraints associated with the site that cannot be dealt with via appropriate design. The development of both NW10/H and the wider NW/024 site would form a logical extension to the urban edge.

Both NW10/H and the full extent of NW/024 constitute a logical extension to the well-served and well-located western edge of Bradford NW.

Two Masterplans, which are contained at Appendix 2, that illustrate how Site NW10/H could be delivered in isolation, or as part of the wider NW/024 site.

Comment

Representation ID: 28850

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency

Site in Flood Zone 1 ONLY
Mitigation should be set above the 1 in 100 plus cc level for the site as suitable for the proposed vulnerability classification (EA standing advice should cover this).

If the site is considered Greenfield then surface water discharge rates post development should be restricted to the pre development Greenfield discharge rate. If the site is considered Brownfield then there should be a 30% reduction in surface water discharges, or restricted to Greenfield rates, there should be no increase in brownfield surface water discharge rates post development. So as to support prevention of cumulative increases to flood risk and should be in line with SuDs design principles.

For developments near ordinary watercourses we would recommend an 8 metre easement strip along the length of the riverbank, or a 45degree angle from the bed in the case of culverts, to be kept clear of permanent structures such as buildings. This is to maintain access to the riverbank for any improvements or maintenance. A Flood Defence Consent may be required for the LLFA for works in/affecting an ordinary watercourse.

For main rivers, we generally require an 8 metre easement strip along the length of the riverbank to be kept clear of permanent structures such as buildings, or a 45degree angle from the bed in the case of culverts. This is to maintain access to the riverbank for any improvements or maintenance. Environmental Flood Risk Activity Permits may be required for development near rivers.

It is possible the sites within close proximity to Flood Zones 3b, 3 and 2 may be subject to future risk identified within the SFRA (to follow) which may affect its allocation or how development should be sequentially laid out on the site.

Consideration must be made to making space for water and providing betterment in terms of flood risk management where ever possible.

Object

Representation ID: 29262

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

See attachment for full representation
Before allocating this site for development:
(1) An assessment needs to be undertaken of the contribution which this site makes to those elements which contribute towards the significance of the Listed Buildings in its vicinity, and what impact the loss of this undeveloped site and its subsequent development might have upon their significance.
(2) If it is considered that the development of this site would harm elements which contribute to the significance of the Listed Buildings, then the measures by which that harm might be removed or reduced need to be effectively tied into the Plan.
(3) If, at the end of the process, it is concluded that the development would still be likely to harm elements which contribute to the significance of these Listed Buildings, then this site should not be allocated unless there are clear public benefits that outweigh the harm (as is
required by NPPF, Paragraph 195 or 196).