Consultation Question 5

Object

Representation ID: 23025

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Arion Jones

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23054

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: K McGregor & M Lloyd

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23110

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: James Brooks

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23139

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Judith Wood

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23168

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Johanna Murray

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23197

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Luke Wellock

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23226

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: John Wright

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23255

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Susan Saville

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23284

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ruth Tyson

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23313

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emily Corbett

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23342

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alan R Wood

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23371

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Matthew Hill

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23400

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Miss N Bateson

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23429

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Martin Tyson

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 23588

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Bryson

3.0 Extensive areas of Vacant Brownfield Land in Bradford

A number of strategic policies within this Local Plan give whole-heartedly support the policies for sustainable growth and development in the district. I also strongly support the policies which prioritise the allocation and use of brownfield sites. These good policies will both work towards the regeneration and also improving the sustainability of key areas, both within the village of Addingham itself and also, more generally, elsewhere within the much-wider Bradford City region.

As even a casual visitor to Bradford can see, much of Bradford’s urban land is now “brownfield and post-industrial”. These large areas of post-industrial of brownfield site is ideal for developing more affordable housing, obviously as part of a wider programme of urban regeneration.

However, in this draft plan, almost no brownfield sites have been identified. This omission is simply bizarre!!!

Object

Representation ID: 23604

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Sandra Auty

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Support

Representation ID: 23659

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Bryson

Addingham Neighbourhood Plan

Addingham has an adopted neighbourhood plan, produced by the Parish Council and which clearly reflects the views of the local electorate. During its preparation residents favoured overwhelmingly favoured the use of brownfield sites and small infill sites (but only if the land is not of high environmental value), as opposed to the use of larger sites and especially those involving the unwarranted release of land in the Green Belt.

Addingham is heavily constrained by Green Belt with limited deliverable brownfield and non-Green Belt growth options available or identified. Strongly support the draft plan’s Policy SP4, which priorities the use of previously developed sites and sustainable green field opportunities ahead of Green Belt sites. However, this key policy has been completely ignored in the selection of actual housing sites.

Object

Representation ID: 24116

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David and Elise Howe

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24160

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Helen Stocker

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24199

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ellie Keighley

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24312

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Benjamin Statham

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24341

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katrina Kennedy

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24370

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Corbett

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24399

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: James Stocker

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24430

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janine Ward

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24459

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Hinchliffe

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24544

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Lyndsey Lloyd

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 24573

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Steven Langford

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.

Support

Representation ID: 24603

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Gleeson Homes

Agent: Pegasus Group (Leeds)

Our client is generally supportive of the prescribed hierarchy for the location of development, however, whilst this is an important priority, it must also strike a sensible balanced against deliverability, sustainability and viability to ensure planmaking applies the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The Local Plan should provide a balanced portfolio of development opportunities, recognising the contribution that appropriately located sustainable greenfield development will make in meeting the overall housing requirement.

Object

Representation ID: 24622

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Michelle Schofield

3.4.1; 3.4.2 - Please see Q2 for BPC’s comment on brownfield delivery. BPC strongly supports BDMC’s decision not to adopt the 35% urban centre uplift proposed by government as this is most likely to be delivered from Green Belt due to the stated non-viability of brownfield land.