Consultation Question 16
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 27726
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Ann Todd
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 27799
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Richard Briggs
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 27816
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Persimmon Homes (West Yorkshire)
Agent: Lichfields
Policy SP15 provides an overarching framework for the consideration, and encouragement, of the creation of healthy places, with Policy CO3 requiring all major developments to undertake a screening assessment and, where applicable, a subsequent Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for major developments, commensurate to the scale of the development, to accompany the planning application.
Whilst the intention of policy SP15 in encouraging development proposals to positively design for creating healthy places is supported, HIA, or HIA screening, as required by Policy CO3 is considered to be an unnecessary requirement. Compliance with the health related planning policies and themes set out in Policy SP15 can be addressed sufficiently within Planning Policy Statements and Design and Access Statements typically submitted with residential applications, and certainly for all major residential applications where such matters would be considered by officers without the need for further reports. It is therefore requested that Policy CO3 be removed from the draft Local Plan.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 27830
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Claire Shouler
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 27894
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Samantha Armitage
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 28193
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Sarah Lucas
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 28283
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Stephen Mould
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 28389
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Joint Committee (GNRTDG, Keighley Town Council & Parish Councils of Cullingworth, Denholme, Haworth, Cross Roads & Stanbury, and Wilsden
Great Northern Railway Trail is currently protected in the UDP & RUDP and planning permission has already been approved for the most part.
Thank the Council for their proposed continued protection of the route between Keighley and Queensbury and refer to policies SP7, SP10, SP11, SP14, SP15, SP16 and TR1, TR2, TR3 & TR4 in their support
Strategy Policy - SP15: Creating Healthy Places
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 28996
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: National Trust
In a similar way to the comments expressed above with regard to GI, we support the policy which supports creating healthy places (SP15). The benefits of improving green infrastructure and access to it and the recognition that it can support healthy lifestyles is an important role that should form an integral aspect of good design particularly in new development proposals.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 29061
Received: 29/03/2021
Respondent: Historic England
The historic environment, in contributing to local character and distinctiveness and thereby a sense of place and identify, can also have a positive influence on peoples wellbeing. This point, and the contribution that attractive and well-designed places can have on peoples health and wellbeing, needs to be acknowledged in the Policy.
Criterion B.1, add the following additional condition:
‘Creating attractive and locally distinctive places to live which contribute towards strengthening community pride and identify in line with Policies SP14, EN4, DS1
and DS3.’
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 29216
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Rachel Wood
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 29569
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Harvey Bosomworth
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 29609
Received: 17/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Mark Summerson
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 30008
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Daniel Spencer
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 30089
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Savia Lorain Hughes
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 30172
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Catherine Terry
BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.