Consultation Question 16

Showing comments and forms 151 to 166 of 166

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27726

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Ann Todd

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27799

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Briggs

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27816

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Persimmon Homes (West Yorkshire)

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

Policy SP15 provides an overarching framework for the consideration, and encouragement, of the creation of healthy places, with Policy CO3 requiring all major developments to undertake a screening assessment and, where applicable, a subsequent Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for major developments, commensurate to the scale of the development, to accompany the planning application.

Whilst the intention of policy SP15 in encouraging development proposals to positively design for creating healthy places is supported, HIA, or HIA screening, as required by Policy CO3 is considered to be an unnecessary requirement. Compliance with the health related planning policies and themes set out in Policy SP15 can be addressed sufficiently within Planning Policy Statements and Design and Access Statements typically submitted with residential applications, and certainly for all major residential applications where such matters would be considered by officers without the need for further reports. It is therefore requested that Policy CO3 be removed from the draft Local Plan.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27830

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Claire Shouler

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27894

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Armitage

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28193

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Lucas

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28283

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Mould

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28389

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Joint Committee (GNRTDG, Keighley Town Council & Parish Councils of Cullingworth, Denholme, Haworth, Cross Roads & Stanbury, and Wilsden

Representation Summary:

Great Northern Railway Trail is currently protected in the UDP & RUDP and planning permission has already been approved for the most part.

Thank the Council for their proposed continued protection of the route between Keighley and Queensbury and refer to policies SP7, SP10, SP11, SP14, SP15, SP16 and TR1, TR2, TR3 & TR4 in their support

Strategy Policy - SP15: Creating Healthy Places

Support

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28996

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: National Trust

Representation Summary:

In a similar way to the comments expressed above with regard to GI, we support the policy which supports creating healthy places (SP15). The benefits of improving green infrastructure and access to it and the recognition that it can support healthy lifestyles is an important role that should form an integral aspect of good design particularly in new development proposals.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29061

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

The historic environment, in contributing to local character and distinctiveness and thereby a sense of place and identify, can also have a positive influence on peoples wellbeing. This point, and the contribution that attractive and well-designed places can have on peoples health and wellbeing, needs to be acknowledged in the Policy.
Criterion B.1, add the following additional condition:
‘Creating attractive and locally distinctive places to live which contribute towards strengthening community pride and identify in line with Policies SP14, EN4, DS1
and DS3.’

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29216

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rachel Wood

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29569

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Harvey Bosomworth

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 29609

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Summerson

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 30008

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Daniel Spencer

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 30089

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Savia Lorain Hughes

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 30172

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Terry

Representation Summary:

BPC accepts that this is a good set of aspirational policies which the plan seeks to deliver, but regrets there is little evidence of fiscal or forward planning to support delivery.