Consultation Question 31

Object

Representation ID: 1723

Received: 16/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Stephens

The potential for high density schemes is recognised, but the wording of the policy suggests it is limited to the City bCentre, Town and District centres. There is no reason why a high density scheme should not be acceptable in a local centre if for example there are appropriate transport links and locals services. The policy should make this clear.

Support

Representation ID: 3281

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Wilsden Parish Council

We are generally supportive of the principles of Policy HO3 on Urban Housing but we believe there should be more clarity in the list of supported locations in A. We are unclear whether the reference to District Centres could be considered to include some Local Service Centres and Local Growth Centres or whether District Centres are purely within the urban city boundaries.

Object

Representation ID: 3696

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Support

Representation ID: 16968

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Avant Homes

Agent: ID Planning

The policy supports the delivery of high quality higher density schemes in urban locations and on sites close to public transport facilities. The policy recognises the sustainability of sites located near to transport services.

We support the policy in the context of rejected site IL/044 at Ilkley which has good access to high frequency bus routes and Ilkley Railway station.

Support

Representation ID: 17655

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Barratt Homes and David Wilson Homes

Agent: ID Planning

The policy supports the delivery of high quality higher density schemes in urban locations and on sites close to public transport facilities. The policy recognises the sustainability of sites located near to transport services.
We support the policy in the context of site ST/1H at Steeton which has good access to Steeton and Silsden Railway Station and access to high frequency bus routes.

Support

Representation ID: 17690

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Bannister Investments Limited

Agent: ID Planning

We support the policy in the context of sites BU/005 and BU/0014 which have good access to existing bus stops on high frequency routes and Burley in Wharfedale train station.

Object

Representation ID: 29070

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Whilst, we support the intention under Criterion A that the
Council will seek to ensure that urban housing schemes in
urban areas are high quality appropriate to their context in
terms of urban grain, height and massing, roofscape,
materials and appearance.