Consultation Question 40

Object

Representation ID: 22514

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22543

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Vicky Gordon

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22572

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22610

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alastair Gordon

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22639

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: George Pitches

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22668

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Till

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22697

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ken Hampton

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22726

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Aaron Henning

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22755

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Daren Murray

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22799

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Styles

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22828

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr John Robson

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22866

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Josie Mitchell

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22895

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alexandra Murray

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22924

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rebecca Cackett

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22953

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Liz Chadwick

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 22982

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Amanda Murray

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23011

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Robert Batty

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23040

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Arion Jones

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23069

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: K McGregor & M Lloyd

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23125

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: James Brooks

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23154

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Judith Wood

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23183

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Johanna Murray

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23212

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Luke Wellock

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23241

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: John Wright

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23270

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Susan Saville

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23299

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ruth Tyson

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23328

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emily Corbett

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23357

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alan R Wood

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23386

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Matthew Hill

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?

Object

Representation ID: 23415

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Miss N Bateson

We fully support a policy which protects, enhances, restores and expands biodiversity and geodiversity. We have a concern over existing flora and fauna being under threat from new development - especially on Green Belt. Compensation for loss of existing biodiversity and offsetting should [4.26.17] be a last resort. How do we qualify and quantify where we need to exercise this last resort? Compensation seems to be an easy approach for developers who might make large profits from Green Belt sites. How do we protect these sites now and in the future? Do we have examples of proposals for how compensation works well and produces good results for communities? How do we get properly independent assessments on impact of development? How do we decide and who decides that benefits of a development outweighs the importance of the biodiversity interest (G)? How will the council promote recommendations for household applications [4.26.12]?