Consultation Question 59

Object

Representation ID: 3716

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Sutcliffe

he green belt was set up to stop urban expansion. In the case of
Bradford, to stop it becoming part of Leeds. Bradford planning office
being completely undemocratic wishes to pour cement and tarmac all
over the green belt in Tong. The reason I say undemocratic is as
follows. ~There has not been one survey, or opinion poll taken in
Bradford, which agrees with Bradford councils views on building on
green belt. In fact approx 90 % of population of Bradford totally
disagree with Bradford councils housing and road plans. However, the council which claims
represents the people is acting like a fascist state.

Your new road and housing plans directly effect my Grade II house and
land. However, you have not had the decency to contact me over the
last 10 years. I doubt you care less about me than the environment and
the creatures that need it.

Comment

Representation ID: 9820

Received: 12/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

EN 21 Waste management within development and resulting disposal of material is a key concern. I don’t know whether that can be addressed through the Local Plan?

Comment

Representation ID: 29244

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency

Construction waste can be problematic in ensuring that it is handled in accordance with all relevant legislation, correct reference to the legislation is recommended and consideration of how the council can influence this is in a practical way.

We would encourage policies that seek to reduce the amount of construction and demolition waste. (This links to reducing primary aggregate demand and increasing secondary aggregate use in minerals planning).
We would encourage policies that encourage good site management and on site waste management plans.