Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Search representations
Results for Chatsworth Settlement Trustees search
New searchObject
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 111
Representation ID: 11385
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
Agent: Richard Wood Associates
Non Assessed Sites - new site - “Land North of Shann Lane, Keighley” has previously been submitted by CST.
It is noted from the February 2021 Call for Sites request that this exercise should only be used to provide information on any new site. This CST site is not on the rejected sites map and we have been unable to find it in the sustainability appraisal and green belt review assessments (appreciating that there is a large volume of information). The CST site is adjacent to site KY/112 which is a rejected site and lies in the Green Belt.
Given CST’s comments on the proposed level of housing growth for Keighley and the need for this to be increased, the Shann Lane site would also provide an opportunity to meet this need.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 2
Representation ID: 28664
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
CST supports the overall emphasis on achieving sustainable development and recognition of its economic, environmental and social dimensions.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 3
Representation ID: 28668
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
CST supports the priorities set out in Policy SP2, especially the emphasis on transforming the economic, environmental, physical and social conditions of the District, with a particular focus on the Regional City of Bradford and key regeneration areas including Keighley. Similarly, the emphasis on supporting, protecting and enhancing the roles of the Principle Towns of Ilkley, Keighley and Bingley is an important spatial priority.
Support of commentary at paragraph 3.3.7 as it provides a helpful and supported statement on the role of principle towns.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 4
Representation ID: 28679
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
Support Policy SP3, in particular that in respect of Principle Towns:
- Ilkley. Keighley and Bingley will be the main focus for housing, employment, shopping, leisure, education, health and cultural activities and facilities
- The roles of Ilkley, Keighley and Bingley as accessible and vibrant places to live , work and invest should be enhanced.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 9
Representation ID: 28695
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
Housing Distribution - Keighley / Principal Towns
Policy SP8 - there is insufficient housing distributed to the Principle Towns and to Keighley within this group of settlements which fulfill a District wide significant role as service, employment and transport hubs for their surrounding areas. A very significant increase is not required but a level more in line with the baseline distribution for Principle Towns, including Keighley, would serve to deliver the plans spatial priorities, better reflect ands deliver the settlement hierarchy and thereby achieve sustainable development.
To support this position:
- a 6% increase for Regional City but a 22% reduction for Principle Towns and a $£% increase for local growth centres (baseline to preferred distribution)
- Policy SP2
- Policy SP3 ... Keighley to be main focus for housing...place to live
- By not fulfilling SP2/SP3 you are not meeting Policy SP1 on delivering sustainable development.
Support
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
KY22/H - Parkwood Rise
Representation ID: 28698
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
CST continues to support KY22/H and confirms the site is available and that CST is a willing landowner. The site supports Policies SP1,SP2, SP3 and will contribute to and help deliver the South East Keighley Strategy.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Consultation Question 111
Representation ID: 29500
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chatsworth Settlement Trustees
The following sites have been rejected:
OA/011 Cackleshaw Farm
KY/109 Harewood Hills Farm
KY/108 Harewood Rise
Given CST's comments on the proposed level of housing growth for Keighley and the need for this to be increased, the above rejected sites would all provide opportunities to meet this need (in whole or in part)
The site "Land North of Shann Lane" has previsouly been submittled by CST. It is noted from the February 2021 Call for Sites request that this exercise should only be used to provide information on any new site. This CST site is not on the rejected sites map and we have been unable to find it in the sustainability appraisal and green belt review assessments (appreciating that there is a large volume of information). The CST site is adjacent to KY/112 which is a rejected site and lies in the Green Belt.
Given CST's comments on the proposed level of housing growth for Keighley and the need for this to be increased, the Shann Lane site would also provide an opportunity to meet this need.