Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Search representations
Results for CEG Land Promotions Ltd search
New searchSupport
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Overview
Representation ID: 27912
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
The SPD sets out a means of mitigating recreational impacts under policy SP11, C, 3b. It should make clear in its introduction that this is the case. We have made comments above regarding the need for policy SP11 D to explicitly state to which part of the policy it applies. Within the SPD, there is brief reference (section 3.1 third bullet point) to the calculation of the financial contribution being the alternative (as per the policy) to the provision of a bespoke mitigation scheme provided pursuant to SP11 C 3 a. This should also be made clearer in the introduction to the document by way of clarification.
See attachments of CEG’s representation to the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) Consultation. This includes:
-Appendix 1 Assessment of the Housing Requirement proposed within Policy SP8
-Appendix 2 Commentary on Evidence Base Documents
-Appendix 3 The Secretary of State’s decision and Inspector’s Report regarding application
16/07870/MAO (reference APP/W4705/V/18/3208020)
-Appendix 4 Burley-in-Wharfedale Alternative Site Assessment (2016)
-Appendix 5 Burley-in-Wharfedale Updated Alternative Site Assessment (April 2019)
-Appendix 6 Scalebor Park Land Registry Extract
-Appendix 7 Response to the HRA, associated policies and the South Pennine Moors
SPA/SAC Planning Framework SPD (prepared by Baker Consultants
Support
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
The zone approach
Representation ID: 27913
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
It should be noted that the flow chart (Figure 2) in paragraph 3.3 is not correct where it references supporting habitat. For the reasons set out above there can be no a Likely Significant Effect if it can be demonstrated through empirical evidence that SPA birds are not present on a development site (see above). The flow chart does not allow for this possibility. It should also be made clear that the LSE test is not whether there are effect upon supporting habitat but rather whether there are effects on the interest features of the SPA birds as a result of effects on supporting habitat.
See attachments of CEG’s representation to the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) Consultation. This includes:
-Appendix 1 Assessment of the Housing Requirement proposed within Policy SP8
-Appendix 2 Commentary on Evidence Base Documents
-Appendix 3 The Secretary of State’s decision and Inspector’s Report regarding application
16/07870/MAO (reference APP/W4705/V/18/3208020)
-Appendix 4 Burley-in-Wharfedale Alternative Site Assessment (2016)
-Appendix 5 Burley-in-Wharfedale Updated Alternative Site Assessment (April 2019)
-Appendix 6 Scalebor Park Land Registry Extract
-Appendix 7 Response to the HRA, associated policies and the South Pennine Moors
SPA/SAC Planning Framework SPD (prepared by Baker Consultants
Support
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Purpose of this SPD
Representation ID: 27914
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
The SPD should make clear in its introduction that that it will only apply to new planning applications validated after the adoption of the SPD in order to provide clarity as to the relevant regimes, and that where planning permission has been granted in the form of an outline planning permission the SPD will not apply to any subsequent application for approval of Reserved Matters. This is on the basis that the policy and its terms will have needed to be addressed prior to the grant of outline planning permission.
See attachments of CEG’s representation to the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) Consultation. This includes:
-Appendix 1 Assessment of the Housing Requirement proposed within Policy SP8
-Appendix 2 Commentary on Evidence Base Documents
-Appendix 3 The Secretary of State’s decision and Inspector’s Report regarding application
16/07870/MAO (reference APP/W4705/V/18/3208020)
-Appendix 4 Burley-in-Wharfedale Alternative Site Assessment (2016)
-Appendix 5 Burley-in-Wharfedale Updated Alternative Site Assessment (April 2019)
-Appendix 6 Scalebor Park Land Registry Extract
-Appendix 7 Response to the HRA, associated policies and the South Pennine Moors
SPA/SAC Planning Framework SPD (prepared by Baker Consultants
