Support
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 27912
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
The SPD sets out a means of mitigating recreational impacts under policy SP11, C, 3b. It should make clear in its introduction that this is the case. We have made comments above regarding the need for policy SP11 D to explicitly state to which part of the policy it applies. Within the SPD, there is brief reference (section 3.1 third bullet point) to the calculation of the financial contribution being the alternative (as per the policy) to the provision of a bespoke mitigation scheme provided pursuant to SP11 C 3 a. This should also be made clearer in the introduction to the document by way of clarification.
See attachments of CEG’s representation to the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) Consultation. This includes:
-Appendix 1 Assessment of the Housing Requirement proposed within Policy SP8
-Appendix 2 Commentary on Evidence Base Documents
-Appendix 3 The Secretary of State’s decision and Inspector’s Report regarding application
16/07870/MAO (reference APP/W4705/V/18/3208020)
-Appendix 4 Burley-in-Wharfedale Alternative Site Assessment (2016)
-Appendix 5 Burley-in-Wharfedale Updated Alternative Site Assessment (April 2019)
-Appendix 6 Scalebor Park Land Registry Extract
-Appendix 7 Response to the HRA, associated policies and the South Pennine Moors
SPA/SAC Planning Framework SPD (prepared by Baker Consultants