Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 16269

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Robbie Feather

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

As set out in the reasonable alternatives considered, there is no requirement in the NPPF to phase sites. It is maintained that this policy is unnecessary and could result in deliverable sites being held back at a time when the Government’s priority is to significantly boost housing supply.

Required Change
-Part E of Policy HO1 should be deleted. Sites that have been identified as suitable for allocation should be able to be brought forward from the date of adoption. To hold back deliverable allocated sites at a time when the housing supply should be boosted is contrary to national policy.