Object

Representation ID: 26530

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Alan Taylor

I do not agree with the allocation of all 8 proposed sites in the village. As mentioned above, a sustainable level of housing growth for the village is around the previous figure of 75, certainly not the 175 proposed in the LP. This would clearly require less land, and could be accommodated on less environmentally damaging sites, including large areas of Green Belt, than proposed.

I do however accept that some Green Belt release will be required even to meet the suggested lower housing figure, as other opportunities are limited.