Object
Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 5748
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Nick Jones
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?
3.7: States "no credible risk" in following areas:
2nd bullet point should read Farm "BUILDINGS"
3rd, & 4th: within 25m of settlement boundary (where you are trying in the Local Plan document, to tell us that Burley has no firm settlement boundaries) & within 25m of a main road. Where is the evidence to support this? Burley residents have ample photographic evidence - this is very wrong!
5th Arable: note1:"...arable CAN be used by SPA species, but BDMC its considered of ltd importance beyond 400m"
Para 3.8: species states Curlew & lapwing are the two most seen types.The citation on CURLEWS is 23yrs old, and doesn't take account of their dramatic decline. Curlew are now on the RED list, and subject of a national preservation campaign.
3.11 Must be an obligation to use.
3.12: NO WEBLINK to note 2
Table1:C: Sheltered etc: Visitors ? Medical ?Transport ? Supplies?Cats ?