Object

Draft South Pennine Moors SPA/SAC Planning Framework Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 5857

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Roger Wilson

Representation Summary:

What are the "exceptional circumstances" mentioned in the first red box?
Again only recreational impact is being considered. Why has the effects of traffic, pollution, noise, impact of pets on wildlife not been included? This is a procedural breach.
Why does the developer devise "suitable mitigation". That guarantees the cheapest possible, superficial cosmetic proposal. Why isn't it BDMC's planning department personnel who devise any mitigation? Are the developers in control of the council now?

Full text:

What are the "exceptional circumstances" mentioned in the first red box?
Again only recreational impact is being considered. Why has the effects of traffic, pollution, noise, impact of pets on wildlife not been included? This is a procedural breach.
Why does the developer devise "suitable mitigation". That guarantees the cheapest possible, superficial cosmetic proposal. Why isn't it BDMC's planning department personnel who devise any mitigation? Are the developers in control of the council now?