SW32/H - Church Street, Buttershaw

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 4465

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Trevor Walsh

Representation Summary:

Too congested

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 4705

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Judy Woods Save our Heritage

Representation Summary:

Although I have no objection as the site is brownfield ,I have objections relating to the factual information regarding access to the site which is incorrect .Odsal road is not the existing access for the site and is quite a distance away .The site constraints relate to access the land to the north is a crude unadopted rd adjoining the main highway in proximity to a school .access to the south is via a busy A road on a steep hill with restricted width ..

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 17158

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

Representation Summary:

It is difficult to imagine how this site can satisfy any question of sustainability without significant enabling works as the access is from an unmade and unadopted road.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 28926

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Site in Flood Zone 1 ONLY
Mitigation should be set above the 1 in 100 plus cc level for the site as suitable for the proposed vulnerability classification (EA standing advice should cover this).

If the site is considered Greenfield then surface water discharge rates post development should be restricted to the pre development Greenfield discharge rate. If the site is considered Brownfield then there should be a 30% reduction in surface water discharges, or restricted to Greenfield rates, there should be no increase in brownfield surface water discharge rates post development. So as to support prevention of cumulative increases to flood risk and should be in line with SuDs design principles.

For developments near ordinary watercourses we would recommend an 8 metre easement strip along the length of the riverbank, or a 45degree angle from the bed in the case of culverts, to be kept clear of permanent structures such as buildings. This is to maintain access to the riverbank for any improvements or maintenance. A Flood Defence Consent may be required for the LLFA for works in/affecting an ordinary watercourse.

For main rivers, we generally require an 8 metre easement strip along the length of the riverbank to be kept clear of permanent structures such as buildings, or a 45degree angle from the bed in the case of culverts. This is to maintain access to the riverbank for any improvements or maintenance. Environmental Flood Risk Activity Permits may be required for development near rivers.

It is possible the sites within close proximity to Flood Zones 3b, 3 and 2 may be subject to future risk identified within the SFRA (to follow) which may affect its allocation or how development should be sequentially laid out on the site.

Consideration must be made to making space for water and providing betterment in terms of flood risk management where ever possible.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 30196

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Bradford District Ward Councillor (Labour)

Representation Summary:

No particular concerns developing the sites highlighted in Buttershaw.