AD5/H - Chapel Street

Object

Representation ID: 30278

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mel Morgan-Davis

Proposal AD5/H, proves that there is a complete and utter disregard for traffic flow, children's safety (it's a narrow much-used walkway for children attending school) and environmental/wildlife issues.
Permitted parking (reasonably required by residents) create bottlenecks and traffic is brought to a standstill.
Implications on overall traffic problems from additional traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 30332

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Paul

AD5/H is a rewilding site with no sensible access for housing.

Object

Representation ID: 30343

Received: 20/03/2021

Respondent: Judy Kennedy

The village has been swamped with huge developments on several sites equivalent to what is proposed in Addingham.
There are no increased amenities to cope with influx of people and cars. Parking is a huge problem.
Fear that the same thing will happen in Addingham wildlife areas, particularly AD5/H will be destroyed. The site is rich in biodiversity. Would be increased traffic on the relatively safe walk to school. Roads are one-way or narrow making traffic difficult.

The Beck back corridor gives a safe walk to school.
I am opposed to other sites in the village as it will fundamentally change the nature of Addingham that ceases to be a village but will become a small town. Wildlife will be destroyed. There are plenty of falling down buildings in the towns and so it would be money well spent in renovating them.

Object

Representation ID: 30357

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Mel Morgan-Davis

Proposal AD5/H, proves that there is a complete and utter disregard for traffic flow, children's safety (it's a narrow much-used walkway for children attending school) and environmental/wildlife issues.
Permitted parking (reasonably required by residents) create bottlenecks and traffic is brought to a standstill.
Implications on overall traffic problems from additional traffic.