Consultation Question 2
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22269
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Sonya Hampton
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22298
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Vivienne McCabe
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22327
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: John McCabe
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22356
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Natalie Shaw
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22467
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Harri Pitches
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22496
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22525
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Vicky Gordon
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22554
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22592
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Alastair Gordon
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22621
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: George Pitches
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22650
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Sarah Till
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22679
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Ken Hampton
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22708
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Aaron Henning
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22737
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Daren Murray
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22781
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Paul Styles
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22810
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr John Robson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22848
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Josie Mitchell
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22877
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Alexandra Murray
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22906
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Rebecca Cackett
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22935
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Liz Chadwick
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22964
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Amanda Murray
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22993
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Robert Batty
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23022
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Arion Jones
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23051
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: K McGregor & M Lloyd
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23107
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: James Brooks
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23136
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Judith Wood
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23165
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Johanna Murray
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23194
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Luke Wellock
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23223
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: John Wright
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23252
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Susan Saville
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.