Consultation Question 2
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23281
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Ruth Tyson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23310
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Emily Corbett
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23339
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Alan R Wood
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23368
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Matthew Hill
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23397
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Miss N Bateson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23426
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Martin Tyson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23601
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Sandra Auty
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24113
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr David and Elise Howe
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24157
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Helen Stocker
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24196
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Ellie Keighley
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24309
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Benjamin Statham
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24338
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Katrina Kennedy
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24367
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Stephen Corbett
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24396
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: James Stocker
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24427
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Janine Ward
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24456
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Catherine Hinchliffe
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24541
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Lyndsey Lloyd
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24570
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Steven Langford
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24619
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Michelle Schofield
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24694
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Danny Schofield
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24732
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Hamish Logan
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24761
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Ashera Grande
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24839
Received: 24/03/2021
Respondent: Chris Knowles
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24926
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Bridget Day
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24955
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Rob Pawson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 24984
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Anil Mander
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 25014
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Louise Judd
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 25044
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Richard Watson
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 25078
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Tina Collins
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 25129
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Donna Radcliffe
A. There is a disconnect between housing and infrastructure delivery. Bradford’s lack of a coherent transport strategy indicates that the Local Plan does not conform to NPPF sustainability policy [s2 7-14].
B. Ref B3 and 3.2.11: we agree this is an important issue but would question whether any progress will be made. Other authorities e.g. Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham have faced the same issue but put in place concrete plans to address them.
Ref B4 aligns with Bradford’s January 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and is a good policy statement but question whether Bradford’s actions meet this aspiration e.g in their attitude toward Leeds Bradford Airport which shows no consideration for Wharfedale residents.
Ref 5b; 1.2.9: we agree with the statements - but do not believe that in practice the allocation of brownfield and non-green belt land is being prioritised first.