Consultation Question 9

Showing comments and forms 271 to 300 of 387

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26829

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dominic Hill

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26858

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Harrison

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26887

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Elkington

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26916

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ella Hyde

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26947

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Waddington

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 26976

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tim Price

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27008

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Rosie Eccles

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27037

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Clare Butland

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27066

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Nabil Basharat

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27119

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ian Sunderland

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27148

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Marianne Clarke

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27177

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Carole Wheeler

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27206

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Julie Sunderland

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27235

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Gary Scott

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27267

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Jane Schofield

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27296

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Alan Lovell

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27325

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Marjorie Rogan

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27354

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Cryer

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27383

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Wendy Barton

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27412

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Bardsley

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27441

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Warren

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27547

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: E.M. Farming & Leisure Ltd

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Representation Summary:

Housing Need and Requirement

Policy approach is not sound. It is inconsistent with national policy (NPPF & PPG).

Substantial concern that the housing requirement (1.704 p.a.) is significantly below the identified Local Housing Need (LHN) as calculated by the Standard Method, which is 2,295 dwellings per year.
No adequate explanation of departure from national policy or Government’s objective to boost housing supply.

Should amend the housing requirement to better reflect the LHN identified by the Standard Method, and take into consideration circumstances set out in the PPG where it may be appropriate to plan for a higher figure and extended plan period to 2040.

Suggested that Policy SP8 should set out a new housing target of 45,900 dwellings, as a minimum; equivalent to 2,295 units per annum for the period to 2040.

SLA identifies supply of 33,466 units –potential shortfall of 12,400 units against the LHN. Housing trajectory is concerning. Plan should be more aspirational about delivery from adoption.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27548

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: E.M. Farming & Leisure Ltd

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Representation Summary:

Components of Supply

SLA identifies supply of 33,466 units – potential shortfall of 12,400 units against the LHN.

A concern is raised that the housing trajectory setting out the projected housing delivery suggests that the mix of sites will not the Council’s LHN in years 1 to 5, followed by an “explosion” of delivery in Year 6. It would more believable if changes in supply were more graded.

Scepticism is applied to the trajectory and the suggestion that the Plan should be more aspirational in the range of sites and number of outlets to deliver the housing requirement from adoption, not five years hence

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27549

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: E.M. Farming & Leisure Ltd

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Representation Summary:

Housing Distribution - Local Service Centres / East Morton

Whilst the drop in housing numbers from the Core Strategy to the Local Plan is explained, the change in distribution across the settlement hierarchy is not clear.

Proposed distribution benefits the Regional City and Local Growth Centres at the expense of Principal Towns and Local Service Centres (LSC). This does not appear to be a justified approach and is not explained by boundary changes to administrative and regeneration initiatives.

Appears to be little logic to the distribution to each of the LSC settlements and a lack of consistency.

More appropriate approach is to change the housing distribution proportions to better reflect the population distribution, giving LSC settlements a requirement of around 2,500 dwellings over the plan period (or 4,180 units should the increased housing requirement of 2,295 dpa be adopted).

SLA shows sufficient land around the LSC settlements to accommodate increased development.

Consideration should be given to allocating sufficient land in East Morton for a minimum of 110 dwellings.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27563

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Thompson

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27642

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: E.M. Farming & Leisure Ltd

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Representation Summary:

Previously Developed Land / Affordable Housing

50% of new homes are expected to come forward on brownfield/previously developed land. Part of site EM/012 is considered to comprise previously developed land.

Whilst it is important to maximise/make effective use of PDL, it is important the ensure that its prioritisation does not compromise the delivery of homes in sustainable locations to meet local needs. Post Covid-19 it will be important to consider the future deliverability of intensely developed residential schemes, which will be dependent on the viability of PDL and demand for high density urban living.

25% of the housing requirement (426 dwellings per annum) is expected to be affordable housing, however the SHMA identifies a net annual imbalance of 441 affordable dwellings per year. Consideration needs to be given to total affordable housing need when determining an appropriate housing requirement. An increase in total housing figures may need to considered where it helps delivery affordable housing.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27688

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Cartwright

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27722

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Ann Todd

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27795

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Briggs

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 27826

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Claire Shouler

Representation Summary:

See answer at Q6.

3.8.45 Please provide the evidence on which this statement is based.

3.8.50 The issue here is not one of affordability but of income and social housing. Affordable social housing needs to be delivered at a very low starting price.

Whilst BPC accept that it is inevitable that some housing need has to be met from green belt, our previous comments about housing viability in Q5 remain. In this section the housing allocation from Burley is 326 units of 625 houses in the Local Plan.

Why could BDMC not consider an affordable housing initiative as in Manchester?