Consultation Question 17

Support

Representation ID: 28390

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Joint Committee (GNRTDG, Keighley Town Council & Parish Councils of Cullingworth, Denholme, Haworth, Cross Roads & Stanbury, and Wilsden

Great Northern Railway Trail is currently protected in the UDP & RUDP and planning permission has already been approved for the most part.

Thank the Council for their proposed continued protection of the route between Keighley and Queensbury and refer to policies SP7, SP10, SP11, SP14, SP15, SP16 and TR1, TR2, TR3 & TR4 in their support

SP16: Working Together
Effective collaboration between the Council, adjoining local planning authorities, the District's Town and Parish Councils, partners, businesses, stakeholders and communities within the District.

Object

Representation ID: 29217

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rachel Wood

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.

Object

Representation ID: 29570

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Harvey Bosomworth

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.

Object

Representation ID: 29610

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Summerson

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.

Comment

Representation ID: 29630

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

• Community / Kirklees ward member / officer engagement: The council request that Kirklees Council officers, ward councillors and the community in the area close to the proposals (particularly Birstall and Birkenshaw / Cleckheaton wards) continue to be consulted as the proposals evolve to ensure any cross-boundary issues are fully considered.

• Education provision:
o The council is keen to review further evidence as it emerges relating to the impacts of the proposed development on education provision in Kirklees.

• Greater reference to cross-boundary working within policies – the council believes that there could be greater reference to cross-boundary working including within policies relating to the highway network (Policy SP1, SP3), White Rose Forest (Policy EN3), Mass Transit (Policy SP6) and strategic green infrastructure (Policy SP10).

Comment

Representation ID: 29677

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Leeds City Council

Infrastructure

a. From discussions and stated in the plan there is more work to be carried out on the accumulative impacts of the plan and allocations, for example with regard to Leeds City Council’s services, highways, flooding, schools (new and extensions), freight park, wildlife, biodiversity, flooding and detailed site requirements, etc. We wish to, reserve our position on this until further evidence / information is provided through further consultation and duty to cooperate discussions.

Comment

Representation ID: 29995

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Harrogate District Council

Thank you for consulting Harrogate Borough Council on the Draft Bradford District Local Plan Regulation 18 (2020-2038).

As discussed in our recent Duty to Cooperate meetings I am happy that there are no significant and/or unresolved cross boundary issues.

As also discussed, I will put you in touch with our AONB manager to discuss sites in the Wharfedale area for which impacts on the Nidderdale AONB will need to be considered. We will also continue dialogue relating to assessment of protected environmental sites.

I look forward to further cooperation between teams as the Local Plan progresses.

Object

Representation ID: 30009

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Daniel Spencer

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.

Object

Representation ID: 30090

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Savia Lorain Hughes

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.

Object

Representation ID: 30173

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Terry

This is a good set of goals. However, BPC is eager to understand BDMC’s intentions to attract new business and new investment and solve a number of issues [See uploaded Burley Local Plan Response]. Please could BDMC indicate how you will address each of these and measure success or failure.