Consultation Question 29

Object

Representation ID: 27448

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Warren

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 27570

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Thompson

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 27695

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Cartwright

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 27729

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Ann Todd

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Comment

Representation ID: 27760

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Persimmon Homes (West Yorkshire)

Agent: Lichfields

Persimmon supports this policy which will assist in facilitating the commencement of development at the earliest opportunity in order to increase the supply of housing and specifically address Council’s long-standing inability to demonstrate a 5-year supply of housing. The prioritisation of large sites is also welcomed and supported for the reasons referred to in the plan.

Object

Representation ID: 27802

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Briggs

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 27833

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Claire Shouler

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 27897

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Armitage

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Comment

Representation ID: 27916

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: E.M. Farming & Leisure Ltd

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Would be beneficial for the policy to provide a table summarising the allocations, their size and capacity. It should include EM/012: Land off Carr Lane/Morton Lane.

Plan should provide a sufficient range of sites to provide enough outlets to maintain delivery. Will enable housebuilders of all sizes to deliver a range of products and offer consumers choice as well as allowing places to grow sustainably.

Plan should ensure availability of a sufficient supply of deliverable and developable land to deliver the requirement, maintain a 5-year land supply and achieve Housing Delivery Test measurements.

Recommended more sites than required are allocated to meet the requirement as a buffer to deal with under-delivery and allow flexibility.

Important that sites are deliverable and planned to an appropriate strategy. Distribution would be expected to follow a logical hierarchy, provide an appropriate development pattern and support sustainable development in all market areas.

Assumptions on site delivery/capacity should be realistic.

Object

Representation ID: 28196

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Lucas

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 28286

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Mould

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 28997

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: National Trust

We are concerned that National Trust land has been incorrectly identified as suitable for development under site ref KY14/H. This site is not available for development and there is no intention to do so. It needs to be deleted from the Plan. See relevant comments under section 5 below.

Support

Representation ID: 29066

Received: 29/03/2021

Respondent: Historic England

We welcome the reference to decisions on whether the
managed release of sites is required being based on, amongst the other principals, the need to prioritise and not undermine proposals for urban regeneration.
The Bradford District has a strong, hugely characterful and distinctive historic environment which make a significant contribution to the areas identity and sense of place. There is significant potential within the District for the sensitive reuse and adaptation of both designated and nondesignated heritage assets, in particular buildings related to the textile industry, to create attractive and sustainable new homes, workplaces and cultural spaces.

Object

Representation ID: 29219

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rachel Wood

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 29572

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Harvey Bosomworth

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 29612

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Summerson

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Comment

Representation ID: 29647

Received: 14/03/2021

Respondent: Cullingworth Parish Council

Since 2013 Cullingworth has witnessed an exponential increase in its housing stock by a further 306 homes, (some still in the process of being built and occupied), with the consequential extra burden placed on the infrastructure of the village.

We refer to item 4.14.11 Managing Housing Delivery - We are very concerned that the existing infrastructure will not have the capacity to cope with even more increased development over the next few years and we request assurances that improvements to the infrastructure of our village will be aligned with current and future development as stated in 5.19.27.

Object

Representation ID: 30011

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Daniel Spencer

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 30092

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Savia Lorain Hughes

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 30175

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Terry

BDMC have clearly identified all sites, including strategic sites, which are specified and allocated in S5 of the Plan. These are shown in Table 4.14.1 which appears to be incorrect. There is a discrepancy between two sets of data. Why is this and how does this affect the delivery of the housing supply?

Also, no sites other than those delivering >400 houses are scheduled to start delivery before 2027 at the earliest. Many of these sites are close to District and employment centres already adequately served by local infrastructure. This would seem to contradict 4.14.10 and 4.14.11, given it has been acknowledged that in Wharfedale at peak times the services already run at capacity and that upgrading should be considered. Once again BDMC’s policy is to deliver 500 homes in Burley-in-Wharfedale on green belt, rather than taking a brownfield first policy approach.

Object

Representation ID: 30290

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Barry Hopkinson

Whilst this policy is supported, an objection is made as some of the allocations to the west of Addingham have been made despite the land not being available for development. Further details are set out in the attached report, including a letter from a landowner indicating that the land will not be available for development. It is therefore not possible to demonstrate that there will be a 5 year housing supply if some of the housing anticipated to come forward in years 0 - 5 is not available for development.