Consultation Question 89

Object

Representation ID: 502

Received: 25/02/2021

Respondent: Mr Neil Collins

Bradford has a plentiful supply of brownfield sites that have not been developed.
In her judgement dated 8/6/2020 in Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum vs Leeds City Council, Mrs Justice Lieven found that it was wrong to leave Green Belt sites in a development plan solely because the Council wished to reduce the numbers around the district proportionately. Green belt should be removed from the plan and brownfield sites built on first.
This judgement is surely just as relevant to Bradford.
Our Prime Minister's "Build Build Build" announcement on 30/6/2020 said brownfield building would be made easier to protect Green Belt. This should be bourne in mind and our Green Belt not built on.

Object

Representation ID: 3316

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Adam Oredecki

Allocations in Bradford North West and adjacent districts appear to have been made without due regard to the cumulative impacts on carbon emissions, traffic congestion, road safety and transport infrastructure particularly at Sandy Lane village and the Sandy Lane cross roads. The Council will be fully aware of the traffic conditions on the B6146 Cottingley Road. Additional development not only within Allerton but wider area has the potential to result in adverse impacts on Sandy Lane village contrary to the Council's planning policies.

Comment

Representation ID: 15436

Received: 19/03/2021

Respondent: Highways England (Yorkshire & North East Team)

It is not considered that locating development within the
settlements within Bradford North West, on their own, will have a severe impact on the capacity, operation and safety of the SRN, and this will be identified through the transport evidence base being prepared by the Council / the individual assessment of the transport implications of the sites by the sites’ promoters.
However, the quantum of sites forms part of a wider cumulative impact within the Bradford North West Area and the rest of the development aspirations within the Plan could severely impact the SRN, and this cumulative impact will need to be established by the Council and considered by Highways England.

Object

Representation ID: 17059

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Andy .

I would like to state my objections to your published plan especially around Sandy Lane and Cottingley. The existing road network is now at breaking point, limited buses run into these areas and services such as healthcare and schools etc. can't cope now. The area is also home to wildlife such as deer and development of areas around Sandy lane will drive wildlife out and cause greater potential for flooding of Cottingley as the culverts won't cope.

Support

Representation ID: 18924

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs WE Nichol

Agent: Carter Jonas

Q89 Local Area Strategy and Plan – Allerton

We support the area strategy and plan for Allerton, in particular the allocation of new housing sites including
Green Belt sites such as Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane reference NW10/H to support new quality housing to support the wider economic, environmental, and social development of the Regional City.

Support

Representation ID: 18934

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs J Kamyar

Agent: Carter Jonas

Q89 Local Area Strategy and Plan – Allerton

We support the area strategy and plan for Allerton, in particular the allocation of new housing sites including
Green Belt sites such as Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane reference NW10/H to support new quality housing to support the wider economic, environmental, and social development of the Regional City.

Support

Representation ID: 18944

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs I Wood

Agent: Carter Jonas

Q89 Local Area Strategy and Plan – Allerton

We support the area strategy and plan for Allerton, in particular the allocation of new housing sites including
Green Belt sites such as Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane reference NW10/H to support new quality housing to support the wider economic, environmental, and social development of the Regional City.

Support

Representation ID: 18954

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr GRN Jones

Agent: Carter Jonas

Q89 Local Area Strategy and Plan – Allerton

We support the area strategy and plan for Allerton, in particular the allocation of new housing sites including
Green Belt sites such as Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane reference NW10/H to support new quality housing to support the wider economic, environmental, and social development of the Regional City.

Support

Representation ID: 27965

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited

Agent: Barton Wilmore

Our Client supports the Council’s Local Area Strategy and Plan for Allerton, which identifies it as a key location for housing growth, with 717 new homes to be allocated and delivered alongside existing planning permissions. Similarly, our Client welcomes the aspiration for new housing developments in Green Belt delivering strong natural landscaping and public open spaces, as these contribute to place making.

We would reiterate our Clients support for the allocation of site NW10/H – Allerton Road, Prune Park Lane, Allerton.

Object

Representation ID: 30265

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jac Morton

Current services (e.g. schools and healthcare) are not sufficient to support the number of residents in Thornton & Allerton, yet this plan will see an additional 1,200 dwellings built with no consideration given to improving infrastructure without having to use yet more Green Belt land.

While many of Allerton's sites are planned on Brownfield sites, the majority of the 700 dwellings planned are flats or apartments.

Allerton is predominately a family area and there is no demand for flats within the ward. Many of these families want to move into homes with a garden and space. Again the local plan is not sympathetic to the needs of the residents, nor is the real lack of social housing being offered in this area. Much of the social housing within Allerton falls just within the limits of liveable - residents should live in a home that is fit for their needs. Not simply adequate by council standards.