Consultation Question 12
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22065
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Rebecca Spencer
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22094
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Lucy Ashton
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22123
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Chris Turner
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22152
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Judy Breckett
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22192
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Paul Hardaker
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22221
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Helen Taylor
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22250
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Dr Ceri Pitches
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22279
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Sonya Hampton
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22308
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Vivienne McCabe
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22337
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: John McCabe
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22366
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Natalie Shaw
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22477
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Harri Pitches
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22506
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Miss Teresa McDonell
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22535
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Vicky Gordon
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22564
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Robin McDonell
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22602
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Alastair Gordon
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22631
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: George Pitches
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22660
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Sarah Till
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22689
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Ken Hampton
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22718
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Aaron Henning
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22747
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mr Daren Murray
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22791
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Paul Styles
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22820
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Mr John Robson
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22858
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Mrs Josie Mitchell
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22887
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Alexandra Murray
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22916
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Rebecca Cackett
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22945
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Liz Chadwick
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 22974
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Amanda Murray
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23003
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Robert Batty
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.
Object
Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021
Representation ID: 23032
Received: 23/03/2021
Respondent: Arion Jones
3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.
Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.