Consultation Question 12

Object

Representation ID: 24849

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Chris Knowles

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Comment

Representation ID: 24895

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

Section C2 of the policy relates to such evidence that may be reasonably required to demonstrate whether land proposed for development affects foraging habitat for qualifying species of the SPA. The policy should therefore allow for evidence to demonstrate that SPA birds are not present on the land in question, rather than simply protecting a particular habitat type, in order to ensure that the policy correctly reflects the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended). The text of policy C2 should be updated to read:

‘2. In Zone B it will be considered, based on such evidence as may be reasonably required, whether land proposed for development affects foraging habitat <DEL: for qualifying species of the> <INSERT: used by SPA birds>. Further guidance can be found in the South Pennine Moors SPD.’

In the interests of clarity it is requested that Section D of the policy, which cross-refers to the South Pennine Moors SPD, makes reference to the specific part of the policy to which it applies (on the basis that SP11 C 3 b relates to a calculated financial contribution, rather than bespoke mitigation provided pursuant to SP11 C 3 a) as follows:
D. The South Pennine Moors SPD sets out a strategic mitigation scheme and a mechanism for the calculation of the financial contributions <INSERT: under policy SP11, C, 3b> to mitigate recreational impacts on the SPA and SAC as a consequence of housing growth and subsequent population increases.

These amendments will also ensure that reference to the provision of new recreational greenspace, or improved open space, as having the potential to mitigate recreational pressure on the SPA/SAC as referred to in Policy CO1 is consistent with the provision of Policy SP11 and the accompanying SPD

Object

Representation ID: 24936

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Bridget Day

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 24965

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rob Pawson

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 24994

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Anil Mander

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25024

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Louise Judd

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25054

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Watson

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25088

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Tina Collins

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25139

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Donna Radcliffe

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25193

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Radcliffe

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25222

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Denise Stanford

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25434

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rebecca Stokes

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25483

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mary Pawson

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25712

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Penny Price

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25741

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sue Bell

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25770

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs M Armitage

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25799

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stuart Bell

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25828

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jackie Cooper

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25857

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Archer

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25886

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jill Buckley

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25915

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Andy Wheeler

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25944

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Christine Hardaker

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 25973

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Norah and David Jackman

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26002

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tom Chatwyn

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26031

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katherine Elston

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26060

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Whiffin

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26089

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine MacIntosh-Dixon

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26118

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Philip Batty

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26147

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sophie Lamb

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.

Object

Representation ID: 26176

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Emma and Anthony Reed

3.11.6 The HRA does not conclusively state that it is South Pennine Moors, rather than the North pennine Moors, that will suffer from the impact of development at Burley-in-Wharfedale, it merely states a ‘likelyhood’. Neither does the HRA exclude the possibility of functional links to the North Pennine Moors AONB. There is no consideration of a functional link between Burley-in-Wharfedale and the AONB, despite its proximity to the settlement. This needs consideration alongside the impact on the SPA/SAC, particularly given there is a river crossing regularly used by residents and visitors to reach the AONB for recreation.

Menston is roughly equidistant from the AONB and SPA/SAC, so similar considerations apply.