Consultation Question 118

Showing comments and forms 151 to 180 of 243

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24567

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Lyndsey Lloyd

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24596

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Steven Langford

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24645

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Michelle Schofield

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24720

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Schofield

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24758

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Hamish Logan

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24787

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ashera Grande

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24865

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Chris Knowles

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24888

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

The Proposed Site Allocation Map identifies site BU1/H: Sun Lane/Ilkley Road as a preferred housing allocation and of course is supported. However, the Site Allocations Map has a residual notation, indicating the site as being washed over by Green Belt. It is also displayed the same way in the separate ‘Local Area Strategy and Plan’ for Burley-in-Wharfedale set out below paragraph 5.16.32 of the main part of the draft local plan. This must be a cartographical error, as Policy SP5 (and associated accompanying text) of the draft plan relating to Green Belt is clear insofar as it identifies exceptional circumstances as required by paragraph 137 of the NPPF to remove land from the Green Belt, with part B of Policy SP5 listing the specific sites that should be released. This list includes site BU1/H.

Accordingly both the Site Allocation Map and the separate Local Area Strategy and Plan for Burley-in-Wharfedale should be amended, such that it depicts the site removed from the Green Belt consistent with Policy SP5 and to solely indicate its allocation for housing.

Comment

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24890

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 5.16.20 acknowledges that Burley-in-Wharfedale is heavily constrained by Green Belt with no practical brownfield or non-Green Belt growth options available or identified, and that it has been necessary to make changes to the adopted Green Belt in order to deliver the target for new homes. This conclusion is clearly supported by the facts and indeed the review of the alternative sites undertaken as part of the common ground agreed between CEG and CBMDC at the Inquiry, as well as the more recent Bradford Strategic Land Assessment 2021. Accordingly, paragraph 5.16.20 should be updated to refer to the “significant contribution” from Green Belt land required in order to meet the housing requirement for Burley-in-Wharfedale. This would reflect the position reached in Policy WD1 of the adopted Core Strategy.

Paragraph 5.16.20 refers to site BU1/H having planning approval, but it being subject to call-in and re-determination by the Secretary of State. In light of the decision made by the Secretary of State on 3rd March to approve the planning application, the latter part of the sentence should be deleted so that the final part of the paragraph simply reads as follows: “….This includes the large site at Sun Lane (BU1/H) to the West of the settlement. This site has planning permission (16/07870/MAO)”

By way of observation, rather than objection, Paragraph 5.16.30 refers to the wide range of community facilities present in Burley-in-Wharfedale, including post offices and a leisure centre and swimming pool. This is incorrect as the settlement is served by a single post
office facility, and there is neither a swimming pool nor leisure centre. This text should therefore be corrected to reflect this.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24952

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Bridget Day

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 24981

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rob Pawson

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25010

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Anil Mander

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25040

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Louise Judd

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25070

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Watson

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25104

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Tina Collins

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25114

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Tina Collins

Representation Summary:

•There are very limited jobs available in Burley in Wharfedale. The new residents would have to travel elsewhere to work. Surely, it would be better to provide housing closer to their places of work to reduce transport needs and support a greener future?
•The detrimental impact on the South Pennine Moors and the North Pennine Moors AONB.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25155

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Donna Radcliffe

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25209

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Radcliffe

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25238

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Denise Stanford

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25240

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Denise Stanford

Representation Summary:

I realise permission has been given now on Sun Lane development- very concerned about flooding to A65. Together with the destruction of green space.
I support the concerns of the parish council on provision of schooling and also the provision of medical care- given the points raised by the Parish Council on Ilkley Grammar and Grange Park Surgery.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25310

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Jeffrey Rothery

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

It is recognised that the requirement of 625 set out in Policy SP8 of the Plan exceeds the baseline population figure (326) and more closely aligns to the Core Strategy requirement of 700.

Whilst we support this increased distribution to the centre, given its sustainability, a higher distribution is supported to make a significant contribution to meeting the districts housing needs.

The distribution to the Regional City, in particular to the City Centre and Canal Rd Corridor is too high and negatively impacts on the distribution to other settlements. This distribution negatively impacts on the distribution to thew wider district and other settlements.

The proposed approach also raises questions with regard to the relative sustainability of sites that will be allocated based on the preferred distribution. Whilst the centre of Bradford has a wide range of services and facilities, the train line runs in a north south direction centrally through the settlement such that urban extension sites to the east and west are physically remote from this sustainable transport option and the City Centre. In contrast, in the smaller centres with railway stations, urban extension sites would still be physically close to access sustainable transport options and facilities in that centre, as well as being readily accessible to the Regional City.

The proposed new housing to Burley in Wharfedale is to be delivered across two sites to the west of the of the settlement to be released from the Green Belt. This strategy limits choice for the local residents - The site at Hag Farm Road is well contained and would form a natural extension to the settlement to provide a mix of use in accordance with the Neighbourhood Plan. The allocation of an additional site will ensure the delivery of a mix of sites to provide market and affordable housing and support services and facilities in the settlement.

Required Change
Whilst the Regional City should be the main focus for housing delivery in the absence of the 35% uplift being applied the quantum of housing should be reduced to a more realistic level (60%) and additional houses should be distributed to Principal Towns, Local Growth Centres such as Burley in Wharfedale where there are not the deliverability constraints

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25398

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mary Pawson

Representation Summary:

Have many concerns about the Local Plan on the following areas:

• Housing Targets
• Use of Brownfield/Greenfield sites
• Use of Current Data
• Transport and Infrastructure
• Environment
• Economic Factors
• Affordable Housing
• Education Provision
• Proposals for Burley in Wharfedale, compared with other local communities

I endorse Burley Parish Council’s response in full

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25450

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rebecca Stokes

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25499

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mary Pawson

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25728

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Penny Price

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25757

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sue Bell

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25786

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs M Armitage

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25815

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stuart Bell

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25844

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jackie Cooper

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.

Object

Draft Bradford District Local Plan - Preferred Options (Regulation 18) February 2021

Representation ID: 25873

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Archer

Representation Summary:

5.6.10 BDMC have recognised that improvements to the road network need consideration. There is a need not only to mitigate local traffic management issues but also issues caused by frequent flooding along the Wharfe valley on both the A65 and A660.

There is no evidence that development needs or [5.16.11] transport needs are being met, only recognition that they are being considered. There are no transport plans which currently exist to address transport infrastructure issues at Burley-in-Wharfedale, or the Wharfe Valley.

5.16.32 It is not clear where any extra secondary school capacity will come from with increased housing development in the Wharfe Valley.