Consultation Questions 46

Support

Representation ID: 25841

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jackie Cooper

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 25870

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Archer

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 25899

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jill Buckley

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 25928

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Andy Wheeler

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 25957

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Christine Hardaker

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 25986

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Norah and David Jackman

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26015

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tom Chatwyn

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26044

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katherine Elston

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26073

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Whiffin

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26102

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine MacIntosh-Dixon

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26131

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Philip Batty

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26160

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sophie Lamb

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26189

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Emma and Anthony Reed

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26218

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Helen Haskins

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26247

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janet Sage

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26276

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Grant

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26306

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Louise Grant

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26341

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Prof. Jonathan Pitches

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26370

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Flint

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26583

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26698

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Owen Sage

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26730

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jane Murphy

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26773

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Rachael Hyde

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26816

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ray Starling

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26845

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dominic Hill

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26874

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Harrison

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26903

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Elkington

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26932

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ella Hyde

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26963

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Waddington

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 26992

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tim Price

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?