Consultation Questions 46

Support

Representation ID: 27024

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Rosie Eccles

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27053

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Clare Butland

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27082

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Nabil Basharat

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27135

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ian Sunderland

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27164

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Marianne Clarke

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27193

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Carole Wheeler

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27222

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Julie Sunderland

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27251

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Gary Scott

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27283

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ms Jane Schofield

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27312

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Alan Lovell

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27341

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Marjorie Rogan

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27370

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Cryer

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27399

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Wendy Barton

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27428

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Bardsley

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27457

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Warren

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27579

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Thompson

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27704

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Cartwright

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27738

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Ann Todd

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Comment

Representation ID: 27781

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Persimmon Homes (West Yorkshire)

Agent: Lichfields

It is assumed that those development requirements set out in sub-section D of Policy EN8: Air Quality, including the requirement for developments to be ‘air quality neutral’, refer only to developments proposed within the Clean Air Zone (CAZ) (as identified on the proposals map) as such requirements are unlikely to be justified outside the CAZ. It is therefore recommended that this is clarified within the policy.

Support

Representation ID: 27811

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Briggs

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27842

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Claire Shouler

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 27906

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Armitage

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 28205

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Lucas

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 28295

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Mould

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 29228

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rachel Wood

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 29581

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Harvey Bosomworth

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 29621

Received: 17/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Summerson

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Comment

Representation ID: 29629

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

• Transport / air quality:
o As the transport modelling has not yet been completed for the proposals set out in this consultation, Kirklees Council is keen to engage in that process to understand the implications of the proposals to inform further comments. This includes:
 Potential impacts on the local road network (particularly Birstall and Birkenshaw / Cleckheaton wards)
 Potential impacts on the strategic network (including the M62 J26/J27 and access to those motorway junctions)
 Understanding the impacts of the potential changes to the A650 which are referred to in the Local Infrastructure Plan but do not appear to be shown on the emerging Policies Map.
o Kirklees Council is keen to understand any air quality implications of the proposals on the Kirklees road network. An Air Quality Management Area in the southern area of Birkenshaw (Whitehall Road East/Bradford Road) should be considered when assessing air quality implications.
o The council is keen for walking and cycling links to be improved in this area especially where this links to Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans and where proposals could facilitate links to the existing/indicative Core Walking and Cycling networks set out in the Kirklees Local Plan.

Support

Representation ID: 30020

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Daniel Spencer

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?

Support

Representation ID: 30101

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Savia Lorain Hughes

We support the idea of developments being at least “air quality neutral” (D1) and find little to disagree with in EN8. Clearly defined enforcement measures, with consequences for infringements are of high importance. We should ensure that any knock-on effects of the development are considered and minimised - including increase of traffic in bottle-neck locations on the road network as a whole. This should include the effects on residents travelling to work in neighbouring districts/ authorities. A holistic approach to this issue is encouraged. Does this policy also apply to commercial development, if so - would regulations be different to those which apply to housing development?