Consultation Question 47

Support

Representation ID: 22674

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Till

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22703

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ken Hampton

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22732

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Aaron Henning

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22761

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Daren Murray

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22805

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Paul Styles

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22834

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr John Robson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22872

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Josie Mitchell

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22901

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alexandra Murray

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22930

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rebecca Cackett

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22959

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Liz Chadwick

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 22988

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Amanda Murray

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23017

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Robert Batty

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23046

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Arion Jones

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23075

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: K McGregor & M Lloyd

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23131

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: James Brooks

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23160

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Judith Wood

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23189

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Johanna Murray

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23218

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Luke Wellock

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23247

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: John Wright

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23276

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Susan Saville

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23305

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Ruth Tyson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23334

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Emily Corbett

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23363

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Alan R Wood

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23392

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Matthew Hill

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23421

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Miss N Bateson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23450

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Martin Tyson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 23625

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Sandra Auty

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24137

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mr David and Elise Howe

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24181

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Helen Stocker

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24220

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ellie Keighley

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.