Consultation Question 47

Support

Representation ID: 24333

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Benjamin Statham

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24362

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katrina Kennedy

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24391

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Corbett

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24420

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: James Stocker

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24451

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janine Ward

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24480

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Hinchliffe

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24565

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Lyndsey Lloyd

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24594

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Steven Langford

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24643

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Michelle Schofield

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24718

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Danny Schofield

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24756

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Hamish Logan

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24785

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ashera Grande

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24863

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Chris Knowles

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24950

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Bridget Day

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 24979

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Rob Pawson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25008

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Anil Mander

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25038

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Louise Judd

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25068

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Richard Watson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25102

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Tina Collins

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25153

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Donna Radcliffe

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25207

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Stephen Radcliffe

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25236

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Denise Stanford

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25448

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Rebecca Stokes

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25497

Received: 23/03/2021

Respondent: Mary Pawson

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25726

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Penny Price

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25755

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sue Bell

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25784

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs M Armitage

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25813

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Stuart Bell

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25842

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jackie Cooper

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25871

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Archer

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.