Consultation Question 47

Support

Representation ID: 25900

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jill Buckley

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25929

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Andy Wheeler

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25958

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Christine Hardaker

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 25987

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Norah and David Jackman

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26016

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tom Chatwyn

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26045

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Katherine Elston

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26074

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Peter Whiffin

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26103

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine MacIntosh-Dixon

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26132

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Philip Batty

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26161

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sophie Lamb

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26190

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Emma and Anthony Reed

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26219

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Helen Haskins

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26248

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janet Sage

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26277

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Grant

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26307

Received: 22/03/2021

Respondent: Louise Grant

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26342

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Prof. Jonathan Pitches

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26371

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Catherine Flint

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26584

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Poulter

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26699

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Mr Owen Sage

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26731

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Jane Murphy

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26774

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Rachael Hyde

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26817

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ray Starling

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26846

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Dominic Hill

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26875

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Sarah Harrison

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26904

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Elkington

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26933

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Ella Hyde

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26964

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Samantha Waddington

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 26993

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Tim Price

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 27025

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Rosie Eccles

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.

Support

Representation ID: 27054

Received: 24/03/2021

Respondent: Clare Butland

We support the whole of EN9, but would suggest that impact assessments should include both local effects and wider effects, including the effect on neighbouring settlements. We would also like to see rigorous enforcement of resultant regulations.